Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234904›Full record

ReviewBotanical studies2017

Post genomics era for orchid research.

Wen-Chieh Tsai, Anne Dievart, Chia-Chi Hsu, Yu-Yun Hsiao, Shang-Yi Chiou, Hsin Huang, Hong-Hwa Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Botanical studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deciphering Molecular Pathways ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of Terpene Synthases in Orchidaceae.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wen-Chieh TsaiInstitute of Tropical Plant Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Anne DievartCIRAD, UMR AGAP, TA A 108/03, Avenue Agropolis, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Chia-Chi HsuDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Yu-Yun HsiaoOrchid Research and Development Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Shang-Yi ChiouDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Hsin HuangDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Hong-Hwa ChenInstitute of Tropical Plant Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. hhchen@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2313-B-006-002-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2321-B-006-026-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among 300,000 species in angiosperms, Orchidaceae containing 30,000 species is one of the largest families. Almost every habitats on earth have orchid plants successfully colonized, and it indicates that orchids are among the plants with significant ecological and evolutionary importance. So far, four orchid genomes have been sequenced, including Phalaenopsis equestris, Dendrobium catenatum, Dendrobium officinale, and Apostaceae shengen. Here, we review the current progress and the direction of orchid research in the post genomics era. These include the orchid genome evolution, genome mapping (genome-wide association analysis, genetic map, physical map), comparative genomics (especially receptor-like kinase and terpene synthase), secondary metabolomics, and genome editing.

Indexed as

Comparative genomicsGenome editingGenome evolutionGWASOrchidaceaePhalaenopsisPost genomics eraReceptor-like kinaseSecondary metabolomicsTerpene synthase

Identifiers

PMID29234904
PMCPMC5727007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.