Trial reportLung2018
A Controlled Trial of Inhaled Bronchodilators in Familial Dysautonomia.
Trial report in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Therapies for Hereditary Peripheral Neuropathies: Systematic Review and Steps Towards a 'treatabolome'.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Respiratory care in familial dysautonomia: Systematic review and expert consensus recommendations.Respiratory medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Future Trends in Nebulized Therapies for Pulmonary Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic lung disease is a leading cause of premature death in patients with familial dysautonomia (FD). A significant number of patients have obstructive airway disease, yet it is not known whether this is pharmacologically reversible.
methodsWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing the beta 2 agonist albuterol with the muscarinic blocker ipratropium bromide in patients homozygous for the IKBKAP founder mutation. Albuterol, ipratropium bromide, and placebo were administered on 3 separate days via nebulizer in the seated position. Airway responsiveness was evaluated using spirometry and impulse oscillometry 30 min post dose. Cardiovascular effects were evaluated by continuous monitoring of blood pressure, RR intervals, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance.
resultsA total of 14 patients completed the trial. Neither active agent had significant detrimental effects on heart rate or rhythm or blood pressure. Albuterol and ipratropium were similar in their bronchodilator effectiveness causing significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1, p = 0.002 and p = 0.030). Impulse oscillometry measures were consistent with a reduction in total airway resistance post nebulization (resistance at 5 Hz p < 0.006).
conclusionAirway obstruction is pharmacologically reversible in a number of patients with FD. In the short term, both albuterol and ipratropium were well tolerated and not associated with major cardiovascular adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.