Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234865›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2018

Electromechanical heterogeneity in the heart : A key to long QT syndrome?

F F Dressler, J Brado, K E Odening

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F F DresslerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
J BradoDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
K E OdeningDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. katja.odening@universitaets-herzzentrum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the healthy heart, physiological heterogeneities in structure and in electrical and mechanical activity are crucial for normal, efficient excitation and pumping. Alterations of heterogeneity have been linked to arrhythmogenesis in various cardiac disorders such as long QT syndrome (LQTS). This inherited arrhythmia disorder is caused by mutations in different ion channel genes and is characterized by (heterogeneously) prolonged cardiac repolarization and increased risk for ventricular tachycardia, syncope and sudden cardiac death. Cardiac electrical and mechanical function are not independent of each other but interact in a bidirectional manner by electromechanical and mechano-electrical coupling. Therefore, changes in either process will affect the other. Recent experimental and clinical evidence suggests that LQTS, which is primarily considered an "electrical" disorder, also exhibits features of disturbed mechanical function and heterogeneity, which in turn appears to correlate with the risk of arrhythmia in the individual patient. In this review, we give a short overview of the current knowledge about physiological and pathological, long QT-related electrical and mechanical heterogeneity in the heart. Also, their respective roles for future risk prediction approaches in LQTS are discussed.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyBiomechanical PhenomenaDeath, Sudden, CardiacDNA Mutational AnalysisElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansIon ChannelsLong QT SyndromeMyocardial ContractionRisk AssessmentSyncopeTachycardia, VentricularIon ChannelsArrhythmogenesisElectromechanical interactionHeart diseasesIon channelsRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.