[Mesenchymal abdominal tumors in children].

G A Krombach

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

[Imaging of abdominal tumors in childhood and adolescence : Part II: relevant intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal tumor entities].Der Radiologe · 2018
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G A KrombachKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Deutschland. gabriele.krombach@uniklinikum-giessen.de.

University of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal tumors in childhood comprise benign and malign entities and differ regarding typical sites of manifestation, age peak and clinical symptoms. In some cases biopsy is mandatory. If nephroblastoma is a possible diagnosis, biopsy must be avoided by all means in order to avoid biopsy tract metastasis. Imaging is used to narrow the differential diagnosis, describe the exact extent of the lesion and deliver complete staging. In pediatric patients sonography and MRI are the most important imaging modalities. Low-dose CT of the thorax serves for assessment of possible pulmonary metastases.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsMesenchymomaChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingThoraxAbdominal mesenchymal tumorsAngiomyolipomaHepatic hemangiomaMesenchymal hamartomaMesoblastic nephroma

Identifiers

PMID29234820

DOI10.1007/s00117-017-0333-9

OpenAlexW2774312801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.