ReviewHNO2018
Neural plasticity and its initiating conditions in tinnitus.
Review in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Review
- Application of neurodegenerative disease treatment strategies in tinnitus: mechanisms, translation, and prospects.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Vicious cycle: the bidirectional relationship and pathophysiological mechanisms of tinnitus and sleep disturbance.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Predictors of long-term postoperative tinnitus outcomes in vestibular schwannoma patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Review
- Dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation to treat tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- The Role of Inflammation in Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Striatal networks for tinnitus treatment targeting.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Lateralization of cerebral blood flow in the auditory cortex of patients with idiopathic tinnitus and healthy controls: An arterial spin labeling study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Tinnitus is associated with improved cognitive performance and speech perception-Can stochastic resonance explain?Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Role of the caudate-putamen nucleus in sensory gating in induced tinnitus in rats.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Disturbed Balance of Inhibitory Signaling Links Hearing Loss and Cognition.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Review
- Electrophysiological correlates of focused attention on low- and high-distressed tinnitus.PloS one · 2020Article
- Auditory Neural Plasticity in Tinnitus Mechanisms and Management.Neural plasticity · 2020Review
- The potential role of auditory prediction error in decompensated tinnitus: An auditory mismatch negativity study.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- Review
- The Characteristic and Short-Term Prognosis of Tinnitus Associated with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Neural plasticity · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDeafferentation caused by cochlear pathology (which can be hidden from the audiogram) activates forms of neural plasticity in auditory pathways, generating tinnitus and its associated conditions including hyperacusis. This article discusses tinnitus mechanisms and suggests how these mechanisms may relate to those involved in normal auditory information processing. MATERIALS AND
methodsResearch findings from animal models of tinnitus and from electromagnetic imaging of tinnitus patients are reviewed which pertain to the role of deafferentation and neural plasticity in tinnitus and hyperacusis.
resultsAuditory neurons compensate for deafferentation by increasing their input/output functions (gain) at multiple levels of the auditory system. Forms of homeostatic plasticity are believed to be responsible for this neural change, which increases the spontaneous and driven activity of neurons in central auditory structures in animals expressing behavioral evidence of tinnitus. Another tinnitus correlate, increased neural synchrony among the affected neurons, is forged by spike-timing-dependent neural plasticity in auditory pathways. Slow oscillations generated by bursting thalamic neurons verified in tinnitus animals appear to modulate neural plasticity in the cortex, integrating tinnitus neural activity with information in brain regions supporting memory, emotion, and consciousness which exhibit increased metabolic activity in tinnitus patients. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe latter process may be induced by transient auditory events in normal processing but it persists in tinnitus, driven by phantom signals from the auditory pathway. Several tinnitus therapies attempt to suppress tinnitus through plasticity, but repeated sessions will likely be needed to prevent tinnitus activity from returning owing to deafferentation as its initiating condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.