Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234599›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: A comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases.

Jane Maryam Rondina, Luiz Kobuti Ferreira, Fabio Luis de Souza Duran, Rodrigo Kubo, Carla Rachel Ono, Claudia Costa Leite, Jerusa Smid, Ricardo Nitrini, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Geraldo F Busatto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial intelligence for molecular neuroimaging.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jane Maryam RondinaLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (LIM 21), Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: j.rondina@ucl.ac.uk.
Luiz Kobuti FerreiraLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (LIM 21), Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Neurociência Aplicada (NAPNA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio Luis de Souza DuranLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (LIM 21), Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo KuboDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla Rachel OnoDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia Costa LeiteDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jerusa SmidDepartment of Neurology and Cognitive Disorders Reference Center (CEREDIC), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo NitriniDepartment of Neurology and Cognitive Disorders Reference Center (CEREDIC), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto BuchpiguelDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Geraldo F BusattoLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (LIM 21), Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Neurociência Aplicada (NAPNA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM) have been applied recently in order to accurately classify individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on neuroimaging data. However, the multivariate nature of the SVM approach often precludes the identification of the brain regions that contribute most to classification accuracy. Multiple kernel learning (MKL) is a sparse machine learning method that allows the identification of the most relevant sources for the classification. By parcelating the brain into regions of interest (ROI) it is possible to use each ROI as a source to MKL (ROI-MKL).

methodsWe applied MKL to multimodal neuroimaging data in order to: 1) compare the diagnostic performance of ROI-MKL and whole-brain SVM in discriminating patients with AD from demographically matched healthy controls and 2) identify the most relevant brain regions to the classification. We used two atlases (AAL and Brodmann's) to parcelate the brain into ROIs and applied ROI-MKL to structural (T1) MRI,

resultsCompared to whole-brain SVM, the ROI-MKL approach resulted in better accuracies (with either atlas) for classification using

conclusionThe MKL-ROI approach highlights the high discriminative weight of a subset of brain regions of known relevance to AD, the selection of which contributes to increased classification accuracy when applied to

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAtlases as TopicBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon18F-FDG-PET, 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission TomographyAAL, Automated Anatomical Labeling (atlas)AD, Alzheimer's DiseaseAlzheimer's DiseaseBA, Brodmann's AreaBrain atlasGM, Gray MatterMKL, Multiple Kernel LearningMKL-ROI, MKL based on regions of interestML, Machine LearningMRIMultiple kernel learningNF, number of featuresNSR, Number of Selected RegionsPETPVE, Partial Volume EffectsrAUC, Ratio between negative and positive Area Under CurverCBF-SPECT, Regional Cerebral Blood FlowROI, Region of InterestSPECTSVM, Support Vector MachineT1-MRI, T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance ImagingTN, True Negative (specificity - proportion of healthy controls correctly classified)TP, True Positive (sensitivity - proportion of patients correctly classified)

Identifiers

PMID29234599
PMCPMC5716956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.