Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234551›Full record

ArticleMalaria research and treatment2017

Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Net among Pregnant Women and Guardians of Children under Five in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Joseph N Inungu, Nestor Ankiba, Mark Minelli, Vincent Mumford, Dido Bolekela, Bienvenu Mukoso, Willy Onema, Etienne Kouton, Dolapo Raji

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph N InunguCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5430-8436
Nestor AnkibaAssociation de Santé Familiale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Mark MinelliCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.
Vincent MumfordCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.
Dido BolekelaCentre Africain de Recherche et Développement, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Bienvenu MukosoCentre Africain de Recherche et Développement, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Willy OnemaAssociation de Santé Familiale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Etienne KoutonCentre de Recherche et d'Appui-Conseil pour le Développement, Benin.
Dolapo RajiCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.
Central Michigan University · USMinistry of Public Health · CDInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · BJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) are one of the most effective tools for preventing malaria in sub-Saharan Africa.

objectiveThis study examined knowledge, attitude, and practice on the use of ITNs in the prevention of malaria among pregnant women and guardians of children under five in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

methodsA total of 5,138 pregnant women and guardians of children under five were interviewed.

resultsThe majority of participants (>80%) knew the signs and symptoms of malaria; 81.6% reported having an ITN in the household, but 78.4% reported using it the night before the interview. Only 71.4% of pregnant women used ITN the night compared to 68.2% of children under five. In the Logistic Regression model, women who believed that it is normal to use ITNs were 1.9 times more likely to use it than those who did not (OR: 1.930); women who were confident in their abilities to use ITNs were 1.9 times more likely than those who were not confident (OR: 1.915); and women who had a good attitude towards ITNs were also more likely to use ITNs compared to those who did not (OR: 1.529).

conclusionNew and innovative evidence-based behavior change interventions are needed to increase the utilization of ITNs among vulnerable groups.

Identifiers

PMID29234551
PMCPMC5694996
OpenAlexW2767244149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.