Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234523›Full record

ArticleClinical hypertension2017

Amlodipine Vs. hydrochlorothiazide: is there any disparity in its antihypertensive effect or not?

Venu Gopal Jonnalagadda, Kanchan Choudhary, Vijay Kranti Matety

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venu Gopal JonnalagaddaDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, Assam 781006 India.ORCID 0000-0001-6684-7739
Kanchan ChoudharyDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Bhupal Nobles' Institute Of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313001 India.
Vijay Kranti MatetyDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, Assam 781006 India.
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · INRabindranath Tagore Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have read the article "Comparison of effects between calcium channel blocker and diuretics in combination with angiotensin II receptor blocker on 24-h central blood pressure and vascular hemodynamic parameters in hypertensive patients: study design for a multicenter, double-blinded, active controlled, phase 4, randomized trial" by GC Oh., et al. and found it quite interesting to learn the testing of effectiveness between amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with losartan. After 4 weeks of therapy, non-responders were exposed for dose titration of losartan/amlodipine 100/5 mg daily or losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 100/25 mg daily. However, authors didn't increase in the amlodipine dose from 5 to 10 mg from randomization. However, as per literature both drugs are non-significant in their blood pressure lowering effect. The clarification on above point will further allay the efficacy concerns of clinicians and result in wider usage of future published data.

Indexed as

ARB blockersCalcium channel blockersHypertensionThiazide diuretics

Identifiers

PMID29234523
PMCPMC5719742
OpenAlexW2773671016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.