Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234504›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2017

The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study.

Peter Ladlow, Russell J Coppack, Shreshth Dharm-Datta, Dean Conway, Edward Sellon, Stephen D Patterson, Alexander N Bennett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter LadlowAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-2969
Russell J CoppackAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey UK.
Shreshth Dharm-DattaAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey UK.
Dean ConwayAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey UK.
Edward SellonImaging Department, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Stephen D PattersonSchool of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University, London, UK.
Alexander N BennettAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey UK.
Royal Rehabilitation Centre · AUOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA challenge for rehabilitation practitioners lies in designing optimal exercise programmes that facilitate musculoskeletal (MSK) adaptations whilst simultaneously accommodating biological healing and the safe loading of an injured limb. A growing body of evidence supports the use of resistance training at a reduced load in combination with blood flow restriction (BFR) to enhance hypertrophic and strength responses in skeletal muscle. In-patient rehabilitation has a long tradition in the UK Military, however, the efficacy of low intensity (LI) BFR training has not been tested in this rehabilitation setting. The aims of this study are to determine (1) the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating LI-BFR training in a residential, multidisciplinary treatment programme and (2) provide preliminary data describing the within and between-group treatment effects of a LI-BFR intervention and a conventional resistance training group in military personnel.

methodsThis is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility study. A minimum of 28 lower-limb injured UK military personnel, aged 18 to 50 years, attending rehabilitation at the UK Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) will be recruited into the study. After completion of baseline measurements, participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3 weeks (15 days) of intensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) in-patient rehabilitation. Group 1 will receive conventional resistance training 3 days per week. Group 2 will perform twice daily LI-BFR training. Both groups will also undertake the same common elements of the existing MDT programme. Repeat follow-up assessments will be undertaken upon completion of treatment. Group 2 participants will be asked to rate their pain response to LI-BFR training every five sessions. DISCUSSION: The results will provide information on the feasibility of a full-scale RCT. Recommendations for an adequately powered study to determine the efficacy of LI-BFR training during in-patient rehabilitation can then be made. The study may also provide insights into the potential effectiveness of LI-BFR training as a novel exercise modality to induce muscle adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loading of the lower-limb.

trial registrationISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN 63585315 dated 25 April 2017.

Indexed as

Blood flow restrictionHypertrophyLower-limbMuscleMusculoskeletal rehabilitationPainStrength

Identifiers

PMID29234504
PMCPMC5723055
OpenAlexW2771746581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.