ArticleCurrent urology2017
The Inverse Association between the Baseline Renal Function and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Molecular-Targeted Agents.
Article in Current urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation and analysis of renal injury in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib: results from the ETER100 study.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Impact of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Serum C-Reactive Protein Level to Overall Survival After Second-Line Targeted Therapy Following Immuno-Oncology Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Article
- The Impact of Renal Impairment on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the baseline renal function in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with molecular-targeted agents. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study included 408 consecutive mRCC patients receiving molecular-targeted therapy, consisting of 124 patients in group A and 284 patients in group B who had baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m
resultsCompared with group A, group B was significantly less likely to have poor prognostic factors, such as a high proportion of patients without nephrectomy. The median overall survivals (OSs) after the initiation of targeted therapy in groups A and B were 21.4 and 35.8 months, respectively, and there was a significant difference in the OS between the 2 groups. However, multivariate analysis showed a lack of independent impact of the baseline renal function on the OS. Furthermore, when patients without a nephrectomy were excluded, no significant difference was noted in the OS between the 2 groups.
conclusionThese findings suggested that there was no adverse impact of an unfavorable baseline renal function on the efficacy of targeted agents against mRCC. Thus, molecular-targeted therapy should not be avoided in mRCC patients with an impaired baseline renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.