Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29234093›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection in oocytes disables pancreas development in sheep.

Marcela Vilarino, Sheikh Tamir Rashid, Fabian Patrik Suchy, Bret Roberts McNabb, Talitha van der Meulen, Eli J Fine, Syed Daniyal Ahsan, Nurlybek Mursaliyev, Vittorio Sebastiano, Santiago Sain Diab and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The making of cells and organs in xenogeneic animal bioreactor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Role of CRISPR and Its Therapeutic Applications in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CRISPR/Cas9 systems: Delivery technologies and biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Ablation ofPNAS nexus · 2023
    Article
  13. Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Single-Step Genome Editing of Small Ruminant Embryos by Electroporation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. International journal of stem cells · 2022
    Review
  18. A deletion at the polled PScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 System in Establishing Large Animal Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcela VilarinoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Sheikh Tamir RashidInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Fabian Patrik SuchyInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Bret Roberts McNabbDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Talitha van der MeulenDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Eli J FineInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Syed Daniyal AhsanInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Nurlybek MursaliyevInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Vittorio SebastianoInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Santiago Sain DiabDavis, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Mark O HuisingDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Hiromitsu NakauchiInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. nakauchi@stanford.edu.
Pablo J RossDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States. pross@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3754
University of California, Davis · USStanford University · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006537/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the ultimate goals of regenerative medicine is the generation of patient-specific organs from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). Sheep are potential hosts for growing human organs through the technique of blastocyst complementation. We report here the creation of pancreatogenesis-disabled sheep by oocyte microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 targeting PDX1, a critical gene for pancreas development. We compared the efficiency of target mutations after microinjecting the CRISPR/Cas9 system in metaphase II (MII) oocytes and zygote stage embryos. MII oocyte microinjection reduced lysis, improved blastocyst rate, increased the number of targeted bi-allelic mutations, and resulted in similar degree of mosaicism when compared to zygote microinjection. While the use of a single sgRNA was efficient at inducing mutated fetuses, the lack of complete gene inactivation resulted in animals with an intact pancreas. When using a dual sgRNA system, we achieved complete PDX1 disruption. This PDX1

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCoumarinsGene EditingGene Knockdown TechniquesHomeodomain ProteinsMicroinjectionsOocytesPancreasReproductive Techniques, AssistedRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSequence Analysis, DNASheepTrans-ActivatorsCoumarinsHomeodomain Proteinsmurayalactonepancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 proteinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID29234093
PMCPMC5727233
OpenAlexW2775431831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.