ArticleScientific reports2017
Evaluation of promoting effect of a novel Cu-bearing metal stent on endothelialization process from in vitro and in vivo studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition effect of copper-bearing metals on arterial neointimal hyperplasia via the AKT/Nrf2/ARE pathwayRegenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Copper-Doped Titanium Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biological applications of copper-containing materials.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug eluting stents (DES) have been extensively applied nowadays and reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) greatly as compared with bare metal stents (BMS). However, the development of DES is hindered by the risk of late stent thrombosis (LST) due to delayed re-endothelialization, while endothelialization is an important process related to ISR and LST after implantation. 316L is a traditional stent material without bioactivity and have a high risk of ISR. Cu is recognized for angiogenesis stimulation in these years. Hence a copper bearing 316L stainless steel (316L-Cu) was prepared and evaluated about its effect on endothelialization in this paper. Compared with traditional 316L, it was proved that 316L-Cu increased the proliferation of co-cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) at first day. Moreover, HUVECs stretched better on the surface of 316L-Cu. It also improved the expression of angiogenesis related genes and tube formation ability in vitro. 316L-Cu-BMS, DES and 316L-BMS were implanted in swine to evaluate the re-endothelialization ability in vivo. And 316L-Cu-BMS showed the best effect on endothelialization with good biosafety. Consequently, 316L-Cu is a kind of promising BMS material for coronary field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.