ArticleScientific reports2017
Enhancing size based size separation through vertical focus microfluidics using secondary flow in a ridged microchannel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-free microfluidic isolation of functional and viable lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- Hydrodynamically induced helical particle drift due to patterned surfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Scaling microfluidic throughput with flow-balanced manifolds to simply control devices with multiple inlets and outlets.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Article
- Microfluidic processing of stem cells for autologous cell replacement.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Review
- A bioinspired, passive microfluidic lobe filtration system.Lab on a chip · 2021Article
- Microfluidics Used as a Tool to Understand and Optimize Membrane Filtration Processes.Membranes · 2020Review
- Label-free microfluidic enrichment of photoreceptor cells.Experimental eye research · 2020Article
- Stiffness based enrichment of leukemia cells using microfluidics.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High throughput size based separation and sorting of bioparticles and cells is critical to a variety of biomedical processing steps for medical diagnostics and pharmaceutical purification. Improving microfluidic size-based particle/cell sorting is a challenge to better address the need for generating more homogeneous subpopulations for study and use. We propose a novel advance to microfluidic sorting devices that uses three-dimensional focusing of the sample to optimally position particles to amplify the size-dependent differences in trajectories caused by differential secondary flows. The result is an increase in the purity of small particles by 35- fold and large particles by 8-fold in comparison to unfocused flow. Our simulated and experimental data reveal for the first time that positioning particles in three-dimensional space can be used to better leverage the differential lateral movement of particles with different sizes as they flow in microchannel with transverse secondary flows. The focusing approach may also be useful to improve positioning of particles with inertial channels with multiple equilibrium positions. This technique performs continuous-flow, high throughput size based sorting of millions of particles and cells in a minute without any pre and post-processing. We have also demonstrated improved enrichment and recovery of white blood cells from human blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.