Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233986›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Reproducible flaws unveil electrostatic aspects of semiconductor electrochemistry.

Yan B Vogel, Long Zhang, Nadim Darwish, Vinicius R Gonçales, Anton Le Brun, J Justin Gooding, Angela Molina, Gordon G Wallace, Michelle L Coote, Joaquin Gonzalez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peeling tape produces strong electric fields via stick-slip friction that drive chemical reactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yan B VogelDepartment of Chemistry, Curtin Institute of Functional Molecules and Interfaces, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Long ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Curtin Institute of Functional Molecules and Interfaces, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Nadim DarwishDepartment of Chemistry, Curtin Institute of Functional Molecules and Interfaces, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Vinicius R GonçalesSchool of Chemistry, Australian Centre for NanoMedicine and ARC Centre of Excellence for Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Anton Le BrunAustralian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, NSW, 2234, Australia.
J Justin GoodingSchool of Chemistry, Australian Centre for NanoMedicine and ARC Centre of Excellence for Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0597
Angela MolinaDepartamento de Quimica Fisica, Universidad de Murcia, 30003, Murcia, Spain.
Gordon G WallaceARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Michelle L CooteARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-7053
Joaquin GonzalezDepartamento de Quimica Fisica, Universidad de Murcia, 30003, Murcia, Spain. josquin@um.es.
Simone CiampiDepartment of Chemistry, Curtin Institute of Functional Molecules and Interfaces, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia. simone.ciampi@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting or manipulating charge-transfer at semiconductor interfaces, from molecular electronics to energy conversion, relies on knowledge generated from a kinetic analysis of the electrode process, as provided by cyclic voltammetry. Scientists and engineers encountering non-ideal shapes and positions in voltammograms are inclined to reject these as flaws. Here we show that non-idealities of redox probes confined at silicon electrodes, namely full width at half maximum <90.6 mV and anti-thermodynamic inverted peak positions, can be reproduced and are not flawed data. These are the manifestation of electrostatic interactions between dynamic molecular charges and the semiconductor's space-charge barrier. We highlight the interplay between dynamic charges and semiconductor by developing a model to decouple effects on barrier from changes to activities of surface-bound molecules. These findings have immediate general implications for a correct kinetic analysis of charge-transfer at semiconductors as well as aiding the study of electrostatics on chemical reactivity.

Identifiers

PMID29233986
PMCPMC5727234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.