Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233985›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Mating system manipulation and the evolution of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila.

Paris Veltsos, Yongxiang Fang, Andrew R Cossins, Rhonda R Snook, Michael G Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paris VeltsosCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-6281
Yongxiang FangCentre for Genomic Researc, Institute for Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BX, UK.
Andrew R CossinsCentre for Genomic Researc, Institute for Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BX, UK.
Rhonda R SnookDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. rhonda.snook@zoologi.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-1448
Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. mgr@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8675

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900753Medical Research Council MR/K002279/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in dioecious animals are pervasive and result from gene expression differences. Elevated sexual selection has been predicted to increase the number and expression of male-biased genes, and experimentally imposing monogamy on Drosophila melanogaster has led to a relative feminisation of the transcriptome. Here, we test this hypothesis further by subjecting another polyandrous species, D. pseudoobscura, to 150 generations of experimental monogamy or elevated polyandry. We find that sex-biased genes do change in expression but, contrary to predictions, there is usually masculinisation of the transcriptome under monogamy, although this depends on tissue and sex. We also identify and describe gene expression changes following courtship experience. Courtship often influences gene expression, including patterns in sex-biased gene expression. Our results confirm that mating system manipulation disproportionately influences sex-biased gene expression but show that the direction of change is dynamic and unpredictable.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMating Preference, AnimalAnimalsDrosophilaFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenes, InsectMaleReproductionSex CharacteristicsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29233985
PMCPMC5727229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.