Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233885›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of general physiology2018

A perspective on Na and K channel inactivation.

Clay M Armstrong, Stephen Hollingworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of general physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Research Progress on Plant Shaker KPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Mechanism of external K+ sensitivity of KCNQ1 channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Update on the Structure of hERG.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clay M ArmstrongDepartment of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA carmstro@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Stephen HollingworthDepartment of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA carmstro@mail.med.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-213X
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are wired with conducting cables called axons that rapidly transmit electrical signals (e.g., "Ouch!") from, for example, the toe to the spinal cord. Because of the high internal resistance of axons (salt water rather than copper), a signal must be reinforced after traveling a short distance. Reinforcement is accomplished by ion channels, Na channels for detecting the signal and reinforcing it by driving it further positive (to near 50 mV) and K channels for then restoring it to the resting level (near -70 mV). The signal is called an action potential and has a duration of roughly a millisecond. The return of membrane voltage (V

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsNeural ConductionAnimalsHumansPotassium ChannelsSodium ChannelsPotassium ChannelsSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID29233885
PMCPMC5749110
OpenAlexW2774089051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.