Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233799›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2017

A Survey of Medical Oncology Training in Australian Medical Schools: Pilot Study.

Mathew George, Hiren Mandaliya, Amy Prawira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Survey on Recognition of Medical Oncology among Medical Students and Junior Residents in Japan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Assessing Oncology Content in the Canadian Internal Medicine Competence by Design Residency Curriculum.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Oncology Education in the Nigerian Medical Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathew GeorgeMedical Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-0684
Hiren Mandaliya *Medical Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0824-7385
Amy PrawiraMedical Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-9333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOncology is a rapidly evolving field with continuous advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Therefore, it is important that medical students are provided with the knowledge and experience required to care for oncology patients and enable them to diagnose and manage toxicities of novel therapeutic agents.

objectiveThis study was performed to understand the medical students' perspective of the oncology education provided in universities across Australia and identify areas of education that could potentially be modified or improved to ultimately attract more students to a career in oncology.

methodsThis pilot cross-sectional study consisted of an 18-question survey that was submitted online to medical students in their final year and interns rotating to the Tamworth Hospital.

resultsThe survey was completed by 94 fifth-year medical students and interns. Oncology was taught both theoretically and clinically for 68% (63/93) of participants, and 48% (44/92) had an exclusive oncology rotation. Both theoretical and clinical oncology assessments were conducted for only 21% (19/92) of participants. Overall, 42% (38/91) of participants were satisfied with their oncology education, and 78% (40/51) were dissatisfied with the number of oncology teaching hours. The importance of a career in oncology was rated as low by 46% (41/90) of participants.

conclusionsThis pilot study indicates that there are potential areas to improve oncology teaching in Australian universities. The majority of surveyed students were dissatisfied with the number of teaching hours they receive in oncology. More global assessment of students and/or interns from other Australian institutes may yield further useful information.

Indexed as

Australiamedicaloncologytraining

Identifiers

PMID29233799
PMCPMC5743919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.