ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018
The real deal: Willingness-to-pay and satiety expectations are greater for real foods versus their images.
Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Object representations in human ventral and dorsal cortex depend on display format and physical distance.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Perceived food value depends on display format, preference strength, and physical accessibility.Appetite · 2025Article
- Review
- How to construct liquid-crystal spectacles to control vision of real-world objects and environments.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Human memory for real-world solid objects is not predicted by responses to image displays.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023Article
- Reversing food preference through multisensory exposure.PloS one · 2023Article
- Graspability Modulates the Stronger Neural Signature of Motor Preparation for Real Objects vs. Pictures.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- The Treachery of Images: How Realism Influences Brain and Behavior.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- Individual differences in sensory and expectation driven interoceptive processes: a novel paradigm with implications for alexithymia, disordered eating and obesity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Viewing images of foods evokes taste quality-specific activity in gustatory insular cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- How Digital Food Affects Our Analog Lives: The Impact of Food Photography on Healthy Eating Behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- What Does Dorsal Cortex Contribute to Perception?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2020Article
- Real-world size coding of solid objects, but not 2-D or 3-D images, in visual agnosia patients with bilateral ventral lesions.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- Article
- Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019Article
- Graspable Objects Grab Attention More Than Images Do.Psychological science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory studies of human dietary choice have relied on computerized two-dimensional (2D) images as stimuli, whereas in everyday life, consumers make decisions in the context of real foods that have actual caloric content and afford grasping and consumption. Surprisingly, few studies have compared whether real foods are valued more than 2D images of foods, and in the studies that have, differences in the stimuli and testing conditions could have resulted in inflated bids for the real foods. Moreover, although the caloric content of food images has been shown to influence valuation, no studies to date have investigated whether 'real food exposure effects' on valuation reflect greater sensitivity to the caloric content of real foods versus images. Here, we compared willingness-to-pay (WTP) for, and expectations about satiety after consuming, everyday snack foods that were displayed as real foods versus 2D images. Critically, our 2D images were matched closely to the real foods for size, background, illumination, and apparent distance, and trial presentation and stimulus timing were identical across conditions. We used linear mixed effects modeling to determine whether effects of display format were modulated by food preference and the caloric content of the foods. Compared to food images, observers were willing to pay 6.62% more for (Experiment 1) and believed that they would feel more satiated after consuming (Experiment 2), foods displayed as real objects. Moreover, these effects appeared to be consistent across food preference, caloric content, as well as observers' estimates of the caloric content of the foods. Together, our results confirm that consumers' perception and valuation of everyday foods is influenced by the format in which they are displayed. Our findings raise important new insights into the factors that shape dietary choice in real-world contexts and highlight potential avenues for improving public health approaches to diet and obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.