Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233524›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

The real deal: Willingness-to-pay and satiety expectations are greater for real foods versus their images.

Carissa A Romero, Michael T Compton, Yueran Yang, Jacqueline C Snow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Viewing images of foods evokes taste quality-specific activity in gustatory insular cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. What Does Dorsal Cortex Contribute to Perception?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carissa A RomeroProgram in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA. Electronic address: Carissaromero2@gmail.com.
Michael T ComptonProgram in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
Yueran YangInterdisciplinary Program in Social Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
Jacqueline C SnowProgram in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA; Interdisciplinary Program in Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA. Electronic address: Jacqueline.c.snow@gmail.com.

Funding

Tracking and EvaluationU54GM104944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI NOONAN, CURTIS WILLIAM · 2013 to 2023
$39.6M
Bringing the Real-World into Cognitive Neuroscience: From Images to Real ObjectsR01EY026701 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jacqueline C Walsh-Snow · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026701NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory studies of human dietary choice have relied on computerized two-dimensional (2D) images as stimuli, whereas in everyday life, consumers make decisions in the context of real foods that have actual caloric content and afford grasping and consumption. Surprisingly, few studies have compared whether real foods are valued more than 2D images of foods, and in the studies that have, differences in the stimuli and testing conditions could have resulted in inflated bids for the real foods. Moreover, although the caloric content of food images has been shown to influence valuation, no studies to date have investigated whether 'real food exposure effects' on valuation reflect greater sensitivity to the caloric content of real foods versus images. Here, we compared willingness-to-pay (WTP) for, and expectations about satiety after consuming, everyday snack foods that were displayed as real foods versus 2D images. Critically, our 2D images were matched closely to the real foods for size, background, illumination, and apparent distance, and trial presentation and stimulus timing were identical across conditions. We used linear mixed effects modeling to determine whether effects of display format were modulated by food preference and the caloric content of the foods. Compared to food images, observers were willing to pay 6.62% more for (Experiment 1) and believed that they would feel more satiated after consuming (Experiment 2), foods displayed as real objects. Moreover, these effects appeared to be consistent across food preference, caloric content, as well as observers' estimates of the caloric content of the foods. Together, our results confirm that consumers' perception and valuation of everyday foods is influenced by the format in which they are displayed. Our findings raise important new insights into the factors that shape dietary choice in real-world contexts and highlight potential avenues for improving public health approaches to diet and obesity.

Indexed as

AdultBehaviorChoice BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMotivationObesityPhotic StimulationYoung AdultCaloric densityImagesReal foodsSatietyValuation

Identifiers

PMID29233524
PMCPMC5966320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.