Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233196›Full record

Trial reportPsychological medicine2018

Online prevention of disordered eating in at-risk young-adult women: a two-country pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Simon M Wilksch, Anne O'Shea, C Barr Taylor, Denise Wilfley, Corinna Jacobi, Tracey D Wade

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon M WilkschSchool of Psychology,Flinders University,South Australia,Australia.
Anne O'SheaSchool of Psychology,Flinders University,South Australia,Australia.
C Barr TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry,Stanford University Medical Center,Stanford,California,USA.
Denise WilfleyDepartment of Psychology,Washington University in St. Louis,St. Louis,Missouri,USA.
Corinna JacobiInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
Tracey D WadeSchool of Psychology,Flinders University,South Australia,Australia.
Flinders University · AUStanford University · USTU Dresden · DEWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Using Technology to Improve Eating Disorders TreatmentR01MH100455 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, CRAIG BARR, WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisordered eating (DE) is a widespread, serious problem. Efficacious prevention programs that can be delivered at-scale are needed.

methodsA pragmatic randomized controlled trial of two online programs was conducted. Participants were young-adult women from Australia and New Zealand seeking to improve their body image. Media Smart-Targeted (MS-T) and Student Bodies (SB) were both 9-module interventions released weekly, whilst control participants received positive body image information. Primary [Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) Global], secondary (DE risk factors) and tertiary (DE) outcome measures were completed at baseline, post-program, 6- and 12-month follow-up.

resultsBaseline was completed by 608 women (M age = 20.71 years); 33 were excluded leaving 575 randomized to: MS-T (N = 191); SB (N = 190) or control (N = 194). Only 66% of those randomized to MS-T or SB accessed the intervention and were included in analyses with controls; 78% of this sample completed measures subsequent to baseline. Primary intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses revealed no differences between groups, while measure completer analyses found MS-T had significantly lower EDE-Q Global than controls at 12-month follow-up. Secondary ITT analyses found MS-T participants reported significantly higher quality of life-mental relative to both SB and controls (6-month follow-up), while MS-T and controls had lower clinical impairment relative to SB (post-program). Amongst measure completers, MS-T scored significantly lower than controls and SB on 5 variables. Of those with baseline DE, MS-T participants were significantly less likely than controls to have DE at 12-month follow-up.

conclusionsGiven both programs were not therapist-moderated, MS-T has potential to achieve reductions in DE risk at low implementation costs.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAdultBody ImageFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansPsychotherapyTelemedicineYoung AdultEating disordersonlinepreventionrisk factorstargeted

Identifiers

PMID29233196
PMCPMC6171351
OpenAlexW2774749008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.