Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233164›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Upper thoracic spine mobilization and mobility exercise versus upper cervical spine mobilization and stabilization exercise in individuals with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial.

Juchul Cho, Eunsang Lee, Seungwon Lee

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06108752 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effect of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Extension Exercises on Pain, Disability, Range of Motion, and Craniovertebral Angle in Young Adults With Text Neck Syndrome.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsNeck Syndrome, Forward Head PostureArmsScapular stabilization exercises, Thoracic extension exercises
NCT06440720 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative effects of elongation longitudinaux avec decoaption osteo articulaire versus upper thoracic mobilization and mobility exercise for the treatment of forward head postures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FaisalabadRan2024 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsPostural, Thoracic Kyphosis, Postural, DefectArmsELDOA ,UPPER THORACIC MOBILIZATION AND MOBILITY EXERCISE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juchul ChoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Eunsang LeeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Seungwon LeeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, South Korea. swlee@syu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-0510
Sahmyook University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough upper cervical and upper thoracic spine mobilization plus therapeutic exercises are common interventions for the management of forward head posture (FHP), no study has directly compared the effectiveness of cervical spine mobilization and stabilization exercise with that of thoracic spine mobilization and mobility exercise in individuals with FHP.

methodsThirty-two participants with FHP were randomized into the cervical group or the thoracic group. The treatment period was 4 weeks, with follow-up assessment at 4 and 6 weeks after the initial examination. Outcome measures including the craniovertebral angle (CVA), cervical range of motion, numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain threshold, neck disability index (NDI), and global rating of change (GRC) were collected. Data were examined with a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (group × time).

resultsParticipants in the thoracic group demonstrated significant improvements (p < .05) in CVA, cervical extension, NPRS, and NDI at the 6-week follow-up compared with those in the cervical group. In addition, 11 of 15 (68.8%) participants in the thoracic group compared with 8 of 16 participants (50%) in the cervical group showed a GRC score of +4 or higher at the 4-week follow-up.

conclusionsThe combination of upper thoracic spine mobilization and mobility exercise demonstrated better overall short-term outcomes in CVA (standing position), cervical extension, NPRS, NDI, and GRC compared with upper cervical spine mobilization and stabilization exercise in individuals with FHP.

trial registrationKCT0002307 , April 11, 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

AdultCervical VertebraeDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleNeckNeck PainPain MeasurementPostureRange of Motion, ArticularThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultForward head postureMobilizationNeck painTherapeutic exercises

Identifiers

PMID29233164
PMCPMC5727966
OpenAlexW2773616229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.