Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233106›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Genetic diversity and distribution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in Limpopo, South Africa.

N T C Maguga-Phasha, N S Munyai, F Mashinya, M E Makgatho, E F Mbajiorgu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatial Distribution of Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Molecular detection ofNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Pathogenomic analyses ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the usefulness of molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Africa: a systematic review.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N T C Maguga-PhashaDepartment of Pathology and Medical Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1107, Sovenga, Mankweng, 0727, South Africa. Tibello.Maguga@ul.ac.za.
N S MunyaiDepartment of Pathology and Medical Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1107, Sovenga, Mankweng, 0727, South Africa.
F MashinyaDepartment of Pathology and Medical Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1107, Sovenga, Mankweng, 0727, South Africa.
M E MakgathoDepartment of Pathology and Medical Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1107, Sovenga, Mankweng, 0727, South Africa.
E F MbajiorguSchool of Anatomical Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Wits Medical School, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
University of Limpopo · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

This study received funds from Department of Science and Technology through the research office of the University of Limpopo. C153 RG2-TBM/XDR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis remains a major health problem and knowledge of the diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in specific geographical regions can contribute to the control of the disease. This study describes the genetic profile of M. tuberculosis in five districts of Limpopo Province.

methodsA total 487 isolates were collected from the National Health Laboratory Services from all regions/districts of Limpopo Province. Only 215 isolates were confirmed to be M. tuberculosis by Bactec Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube 960® and Rhodamine-Auramine staining. Isolates were subcultured on Löwenstein-Jensen medium agar slants to validate purity. They were spoligotyped and data analysed using the international spoligotyping database 4 (SpolDB4).

resultsOf the 215 isolates, 134 (62.3%) were genotyped into 21 genotype families while 81 (37.7%) were orphans. The 81 orphans were further subjected to resolution employing SpolDB3/RIM. Overall, the study revealed a high diversity of strains of 32 predominantly the non-Beijing lineages: the LAM- LAM3 (9.8%), LAM9 (4.7%) and LAM11- ZWE (3.3%), the T-T1(15.0%), T2 (0.9%), T2-T3 (1.4%), the CAS-CAS1-Delhi 5 (1.9%) and CAS1-KILI (1.4%) the MANU2 (1.4%), U (0.5%), X-X1(1.4%), X3 (1.9%), S (9.8%), CAS (1.4%), LAM7(0.9%), T3(0.5%), LAM8(4.7%), T4(1.4%), X2(0.4%), AI5(1.9%), LAM1(0.5%), FAMILY33 (1.9%), EAI4(1.4%), M. microti (1.9%). The Beijing and Beijing-like families were (14.9%) and (0.9%), respectively. A total of 28(13%) clusters and 77(36%) unique cases were identified. Beijing strain (SIT 1) formed the biggest cluster constituting 14%, followed by LAM3 (SIT 33), T1 (SIT 53) and LAM4 (SIT 811) with 7%, 5.1% and 2.8%, respectively. The Beijing family was the only genotype found in all the five districts and was predominant in Mopani (18.8%), Sekhukhune (23.7%) and Vhembe (23.3%). Dominant genotypes in Capricorn and Waterberg were LAM3 (11.9%) and T1 (13.3%), respectively.

conclusionA wide diversity of lineages was demonstrated at district level. A high number of clusters per district provided evidence of on-going transmission in this Province.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationDNA, BacterialGenotypeHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisSouth AfricaTuberculosisDNA, BacterialGenetic diversityMycobacterium tuberculosisSpoligotyping

Identifiers

PMID29233106
PMCPMC5727936
OpenAlexW2773897142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.