Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29233035›Full record

ArticleVirulence2018

From the wound to the bench: exoproteome interplay between wound-colonizing Staphylococcus aureus strains and co-existing bacteria.

Andrea N García-Pérez, Anne de Jong, Sabryna Junker, Dörte Becher, Monika A Chlebowicz, José C Duipmans, Marcel F Jonkman, Jan Maarten van Dijl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virulence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Novel Cytoplasmic Bacteriocin Compounds Derived fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Membrane Modulation of Super-Secreting "midiFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea N García-Péreza Department of Medical Microbiology , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Hanzeplein 1, Groningen , the Netherlands.
Anne de Jongb Department of Molecular Genetics , Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen , AG Groningen , the Netherlands.
Sabryna Junkerc Institute for Microbiology , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald , Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 15, Greifswald , Germany.
Dörte Becherc Institute for Microbiology , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald , Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 15, Greifswald , Germany.
Monika A Chlebowicza Department of Medical Microbiology , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Hanzeplein 1, Groningen , the Netherlands.
José C Duipmansd Department of Dermatology , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Hanzeplein 1, RB Groningen , the Netherlands.
Marcel F Jonkmand Department of Dermatology , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Hanzeplein 1, RB Groningen , the Netherlands.
Jan Maarten van Dijla Department of Medical Microbiology , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Hanzeplein 1, Groningen , the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound-colonizing microorganisms can form complex and dynamic polymicrobial communities where pathogens and commensals may co-exist, cooperate or compete with each other. The present study was aimed at identifying possible interactions between different bacteria isolated from the same chronic wound of a patient with the genetic blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Specifically, this involved two different isolates of the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, and isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis and Klebsiella oxytoca. Particular focus was attributed to interactions of S. aureus with the two other species, because of the high staphylococcal prevalence among chronic wounds. Intriguingly, upon co-cultivation, none of the wound isolates inhibited each other's growth. Since the extracellular proteome of bacterial pathogens is a reservoir of virulence factors, the exoproteomes of the staphylococcal isolates in monoculture and co-culture with B. thuringiensis and K. oxytoca were characterized by Mass Spectrometry to explore the inherent relationships between these co-exisiting bacteria. This revealed a massive reduction in the number of staphylococcal exoproteins upon co-culturing with K. oxytoca or B. thuringiensis. Interestingly, this decrease was particularly evident for extracellular proteins with a predicted cytoplasmic localization, which were recently implicated in staphylococcal virulence and epidemiology. Furthermore, our exoproteome analysis uncovered potential cooperativity between the two different S. aureus isolates. Altogether, the observed exoproteome variations upon co-culturing are indicative of unprecedented adaptive mechanisms that set limits to the production of secreted staphylococcal virulence factors.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsBacillus thuringiensisBacterial ProteinsCoinfectionEpidermolysis BullosaHumansKlebsiella oxytocaMass SpectrometryProteomeStaphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsProteomeBacillus thuringiensischronic woundco-cultureexoproteomeKlebsiella oxytocaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID29233035
PMCPMC5955179
OpenAlexW2772995249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.