Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29232980›Full record

Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2018

Effectiveness of aquatic versus land physiotherapy in the treatment of peripheral neuropathies: a randomized controlled trial.

Ilaria Zivi, Sara Maffia, Vanessa Ferrari, Alessio Zarucchi, Katia Molatore, Roberto Maestri, Giuseppe Frazzitta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria Zivi1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Sara Maffia1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Vanessa Ferrari1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Alessio Zarucchi1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Katia Molatore1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Roberto Maestri2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Spa Società Benefit, IRCCS Montescano, Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppe Frazzitta1 Department of Brain Injury and Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation, Ospedale "Moriggia-Pelascini", Gravedona ed Uniti (Como), Italy.
Moriggia Pelascini Hospital · ITIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects on gait and balance of aquatic physiotherapy versus on-land training, in the context of an inpatient rehabilitation treatment tailored for peripheral neuropathies.

designParallel-group, single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS AND

settingConsecutive patients affected by peripheral neuropathy admitted in our Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit.

interventionsPatients received a four-week rehabilitation program composed by daily sessions of conventional physiotherapy and three sessions/week of specific treatment (aquatic vs. on-land). MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were Berg Balance Scale and Dynamic Gait Index. Secondary outcome measures were Neuropathic Pain Scale, Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Functional Ambulation Classification, Conley Scale and Medical Research Council Scale score for the strength of hip and ankle flexor and extensor muscles. For each scale, we calculated the difference between the scores at discharge and admission and compared it between the two groups.

resultsForty patients were enrolled: 21 in the water-based rehabilitation group and 19 in the land-based one. Patients were similar between groups. When comparing the groups, we found that "in-water" patients had a significant better improvement in the Dynamic Gait Index score (6.00 (4.00, 7.25) vs. 4.00 (1.25, 6.00), P = 0.0433). On the opposite, the "on-land" group showed a better improvement of the Functional Ambulation Classification score (1.0 (0.75, 1.0) vs. 1.0 (1.0, 2.0), P = 0.0386).

conclusionAquatic physiotherapy showed an effect comparable to the land-based rehabilitation on gait and balance dysfunctions of neuropathic patients.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHydrotherapyAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMalePeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPostural BalanceSingle-Blind Methodaquatic therapybalancegaitneuropathic painRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29232980
PMCPMC5952298
OpenAlexW2773973736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.