ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Biomimetic Sensors for the Senses: Towards Better Understanding of Taste and Odor Sensation.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances and Unaddressed Challenges in Biomimetic Olfactory- and Taste-Based Biosensors: Moving Towards Integrated, AI-Powered, and Market-Ready Sensing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in cell-based biosensors: Transforming food flavor evaluation with novel approaches.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Management for stroke intelligent early warning empowered by big data.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2023Article
- Field-Effect Sensors Using Biomaterials for Chemical Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Biomimetic Nanostructure Platform for Cancer Diagnosis Based on Tumor Biomarkers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Ion Chromatographic Fingerprinting of STC-1 Cellular Response for Taste Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Statistical models discriminating between complex samples measured with microfluidic receptor-cell arrays.PloS one · 2019Article
- Protein- and Peptide-Based Biosensors in Artificial Olfaction.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Taste and smell are very important chemical senses that provide indispensable information on food quality, potential mates and potential danger. In recent decades, much progress has been achieved regarding the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms of taste and odor senses. Recently, biosensors have been developed for detecting odorants and tastants as well as for studying ligand-receptor interactions. This review summarizes the currently available biosensing approaches, which can be classified into two main categories: in vitro and in vivo approaches. The former is based on utilizing biological components such as taste and olfactory tissues, cells and receptors, as sensitive elements. The latter is dependent on signals recorded from animals' signaling pathways using implanted microelectrodes into living animals. Advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches, as well as differences in terms of sensing principles and applications are highlighted. The main current challenges, future trends and prospects of research in biomimetic taste and odor sensors are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.