Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29232467›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer.

K Odunsi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03922776 (Phenotypic Characterization Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes at Diagnosis and After Chemotherapy in Advanced High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Blood, Ascites, Peritoneal Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 248 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
248citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03922776 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phenotypic Characterization Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes at Diagnosis and After Chemotherapy in Advanced High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Blood, Ascites, Peritoneal Biopsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2019 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsOvarian Cancer Stage IIIC, Fallopian Tube Cancer Stage IIIC, Fallopian Tube Cancer Stage IV, Ovarian Cancer Stage IVArmsBlood sample collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

248 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 404 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inducing ferroptosis to improve cancer therapy: a promising tool for enhancing immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

188 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

K OdunsiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B. · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
mTOR inhibition for generating memory T cells to enhance ovarian tumor immunityR01CA158318 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ODUNSI, KUNLE, SHRIKANT, PROTUL · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunological destruction of tumors is a multistep, coordinated process that can be modulated or targeted at several critical points to elicit tumor rejection. These steps in the cancer immunity cycle include: (i) generation of sufficient numbers of effector T cells with high avidity recognition of tumor antigens in vivo; (ii) trafficking and infiltration into the tumor; (iii) overcoming inhibitory networks in the tumor microenvironment; (iv) direct recognition of tumor antigens and generation of an effector anti-tumor response; and (v) persistence of the anti-tumor T cells. In an effort to understand whether the immune system plays a role in controlling ovarian cancer, our group and others demonstrated that the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with improved clinical outcome in ovarian cancer patients. Recently, we hypothesized that the quality of infiltrating T cells could also be a critical determinant of outcome in ovarian cancer patients. In the past decade, several immune-based interventions have gained regulatory approval in many solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. These interventions include immune checkpoint blockade, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy. There are currently no approved immune therapies for ovarian cancer. Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer will have to consider the immune suppressive networks within the ovarian tumor microenvironment; therefore, a major direction is to develop biomarkers that would predict responsiveness to different types of immunotherapies, and allow for treatment selection based on the results. Moreover, such biomarkers would allow rational combination of immunotherapies, while minimizing toxicities. In this review, the current understanding of the host immune response in ovarian cancer patients will be briefly reviewed, progress in immune therapies, and future directions for exploiting immune based strategies for long lasting durable cure.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyOvarian NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadoptive cell therapycancer vaccinesimmunomodulationimmunotherapyNY-ESO-1T cellstumor antigens

Identifiers

PMID29232467
PMCPMC5834124
OpenAlexW2773771998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.