SynthesisPloS one2017
Dynamic MRI to quantify musculoskeletal motion: A systematic review of concurrent validity and reliability, and perspectives for evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bimanual movements in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of instrumented assessments.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Quantifying skeletal muscle volume and shape in humans using MRI: A systematic review of validity and reliability.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Preliminary Evaluation of Static and Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Feline Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ): A Comparative Analysis of Joint Inclination Angles in Intact and Dislocated Conditions.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- HSGDNet: Hybrid Synthetic-Data-Guided Deep Learning With NLS Refinement for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Knee Mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- MRI sequences at different degrees of flexion to investigate knee popping: an unusual way to diagnose an isolated pigmented villonodular synovitis lesion.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Real-time water/fat imaging at 0.55T with spiral out-in-out-in sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Real-time MRI of the moving wrist at 0.55 tesla.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Anterior-posterior glenohumeral translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability: a systematic review of the literature.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Review
- MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- A novel multipurpose device for guided knee motion and loading during dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022Article
- Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Review
- Dynamic MRI for articulating joint evaluation on 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners: setup, protocols, and real-time sequences.Insights into imaging · 2020Review
- Dynamic MRI of the wrist in less than 20 seconds: normal midcarpal motion and reader reliability.Skeletal radiology · 2020Article
- The effect of patellofemoral pain syndrome on patellofemoral joint kinematics under upright weight-bearing conditions.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report evidence for the concurrent validity and reliability of dynamic MRI techniques to evaluate in vivo joint and muscle mechanics, and to propose recommendations for their use in the assessment of normal and impaired musculoskeletal function. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe search was conducted on articles published in Web of science, PubMed, Scopus, Academic search Premier, and Cochrane Library between 1990 and August 2017. Studies that reported the concurrent validity and/or reliability of dynamic MRI techniques for in vivo evaluation of joint or muscle mechanics were included after assessment by two independent reviewers. Selected articles were assessed using an adapted quality assessment tool and a data extraction process. Results for concurrent validity and reliability were categorized as poor, moderate, or excellent.
resultsTwenty articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a mean quality assessment score of 66% (±10.4%). Concurrent validity and/or reliability of eight dynamic MRI techniques were reported, with the knee being the most evaluated joint (seven studies). Moderate to excellent concurrent validity and reliability were reported for seven out of eight dynamic MRI techniques. Cine phase contrast and real-time MRI appeared to be the most valid and reliable techniques to evaluate joint motion, and spin tag for muscle motion.
conclusionDynamic MRI techniques are promising for the in vivo evaluation of musculoskeletal mechanics; however results should be evaluated with caution since validity and reliability have not been determined for all joints and muscles, nor for many pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.