Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29232400›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Biological characterization of a novel in vitro cell irradiator.

Tyler L Fowler, Michael M Fisher, Alison M Bailey, Bryan P Bednarz, Randall J Kimple

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler L FowlerDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Michael M FisherDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Alison M BaileyDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Bryan P BednarzDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Randall J KimpleDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8000
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma radiation response modulation by HPVR00CA160639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIMPLE, RANDALL J. · 2013 to 2015
$725k
Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma radiation response modulation by HPVK99CA160639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIMPLE, RANDALL J. · 2011 to 2012
$298k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA160639NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R00 CA160639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the overall robustness of a novel cellular irradiator we performed a series of well-characterized, dose-responsive assays to assess the consequences of DNA damage. We used a previously described novel irradiation system and a traditional 137Cs source to irradiate a cell line. The generation of reactive oxygen species was assessed using chloromethyl-H2DCFDA dye, the induction of DNA DSBs was observed using the comet assay, and the initiation of DNA break repair was assessed through γH2AX image cytometry. A high correlation between physical absorbed dose and biologic dose was seen for the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species, physical DNA double strand breaks, and modulation of the cellular double stand break pathway. The results compared favorably to irradiation with a traditional 137Cs source. The rapid, straightforward tests described form a reasonable approach for biologic characterization of novel irradiators. These additional testing metrics go beyond standard physics testing such as Monte Carlo simulation and thermo-luminescent dosimeter evaluation to confirm that a novel irradiator can produce the desired dose effects in vitro. Further, assessment of these biological metrics confirms that the physical handling of the cells during the irradiation process results in biologic effects that scale appropriately with dose.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignCell Line, TransformedCesium RadioisotopesComet AssayHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMonte Carlo MethodPalatine TonsilReactive Oxygen SpeciesCesium RadioisotopesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID29232400
PMCPMC5726654
OpenAlexW2773300655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.