Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29232186›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2017

Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.

Jean-Louis Prudhon, Régis Verdier

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04017533 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

In Vivo Stability of an Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty With Medially Stabilized Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled31ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsGMK Sphere TKR
NCT05651009 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs Using CT Micromotion Analysis - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelse Møre og Romsdal HFRan2022 to 2033Enrolled50ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsTKA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. No effect of fixation type on early and late mortality after total knee arthroplasty: a Dutch arthroplasty register study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Comparison of effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty with tantalum monoblock tibial component and cemented tibial plateau prosthesis in patients of different ages].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean-Louis PrudhonCentre ostéo-articulaire, 5 rue Raoul Blanchard, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Régis VerdierGroupe Lépine, 175 rue Jacquard, CS 50307, 69727 Genay Cedex, France.
Groupe Lépine (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince 1996 we have been using cementless fixation with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The purpose of this paper is to compare survivorship of a series of 100 cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to a similar series of 100 cementless with a follow up of 11-16 years. Material methods: Both TKA are mobile bearing total knee postero-stabilized. They can be used with cement or without cement. Among 1030 New Wave TKATM implanted from 2002 to 2015 we have identified 100 cemented TKAs and 100 cementless TKAs. All these cases were primary replacement. Differences in survival probability were determined using log-rank test.

resultsSurvival probabilities at 11 years of follow-up were: Cemented group: 90.2% CI95% [81.9-94.8]; Cementless group: 95.4% CI95% [88.1-98.2]. Comparison between both group showed significant difference, p = 0.32. DISCUSSION: The advantages of cementless TKA are bone stock preservation, cement debris protection and the potential to achieve biologic fixation. Cementless implants rely on a porous or roughened surface to facilitate bone formation. HA has been shown to accelerate bone integration and to decrease micro motion of the components and to increase fixation. With a survival probability of 90.2% (cemented version) and 95.4% (cementless version), this total knee prosthesis performs as intended in primary total knee arthroplasty. No statistical differences could be found between cemented and cementless implants.

Identifiers

PMID29232186
PMCPMC5726856
OpenAlexW2771226371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.