Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29232175›Full record

Observational studyTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2018

Developing a Newborn Resuscitation Telemedicine Program: A Comparison of Two Technologies.

Jenna A Beck, Julie A Jensen, Rochelle F Putzier, Lisa A Stubert, Kathleen D Stuart, Hussain Mohammed, Beth L Kreofsky, Kelly W Boles, Christopher E Colby, Jennifer L Fang

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing a Newborn Resuscitation Telemedicine Program: A Follow-Up Study Comparing Two Technologies.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  5. Scope of telemedicine in neonatology.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Review
  6. Neonatal transport in California: findings from a qualitative investigation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jenna A Beck1 Department of Management Engineering and Internal Consulting, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Julie A Jensen1 Department of Management Engineering and Internal Consulting, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Rochelle F Putzier2 Center for Connected Care , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Lisa A Stubert2 Center for Connected Care , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathleen D Stuart3 Division of Media Support Services, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Hussain Mohammed3 Division of Media Support Services, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Beth L Kreofsky2 Center for Connected Care , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kelly W Boles3 Division of Media Support Services, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Christopher E Colby4 Division of Neonatal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Jennifer L Fang4 Division of Neonatal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly work has demonstrated the feasibility and acceptance of newborn resuscitation telemedicine programs (NRTPs). The technology requirements for providing this type of emergency telemedicine service are unclear.

introductionWe hypothesized that during NRTP consults, a wired telemedicine cart would provide a more reliable and higher-quality user experience than a consumer-grade wireless tablet. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, six spoke sites used consumer-grade wireless tablets during preintervention and wired coder/decoder (CODEC)-based telemedicine carts during postintervention. Both technologies used the same videoconferencing software. After the telemedicine consult, providers completed surveys assessing connection reliability, user satisfaction, and audio and video quality using a 1-5 Likert scale.

resultsPreintervention, users completed 99 consults and 95 surveys. Postintervention, users completed 73 consults and 192 surveys. Successful connection on first attempt was significantly improved with the wired cart compared with the wireless tablet (82.7% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.01), and the percentage of consults complicated by an unplanned disconnection was reduced (6.4% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.02). User satisfaction and video and audio quality ratings were significantly higher for the wired cart. DISCUSSION: The wired telemedicine cart increased connection reliability, which is important given the critical nature and long duration of NRTP consults. Audio-video quality was also improved, allowing for better visualization of the neonate and communication with the care team.

conclusionsConsumer-grade wireless tablets did not meet the program's technical requirements. Wired telemedicine carts improved reliability, user satisfaction, and audio-video quality. Wired carts may not fully meet NRTP requirements because of cart size and limited mobility.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldVideoconferencingWireless TechnologyCardiopulmonary ResuscitationClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationRemote ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSoftwareSurveys and Questionnairespediatricstechnologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29232175
PMCPMC6065527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.