Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29231811›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Genome-wide mapping of sister chromatid exchange events in single yeast cells using Strand-seq.

Clémence Claussin, David Porubský, Diana Cj Spierings, Nancy Halsema, Stefan Rentas, Victor Guryev, Peter M Lansdorp, Michael Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of "hidden" mitotic crossovers by long-read DNA sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mitotic recombination in yeast: what we know and what we don't know.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Clémence ClaussinEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-3596
David PorubskýEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Diana Cj SpieringsEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Nancy HalsemaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Stefan RentasTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Victor GuryevEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Peter M LansdorpEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-1071
Michael ChangEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-3337
University Medical Center Groningen · NLBC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination involving sister chromatids is the most accurate, and thus most frequently used, form of recombination-mediated DNA repair. Despite its importance, sister chromatid recombination is not easily studied because it does not result in a change in DNA sequence, making recombination between sister chromatids difficult to detect. We have previously developed a novel DNA template strand sequencing technique, called Strand-seq, that can be used to map sister chromatid exchange (SCE) events genome-wide in single cells. An increase in the rate of SCE is an indicator of elevated recombination activity and of genome instability, which is a hallmark of cancer. In this study, we have adapted Strand-seq to detect SCE in the yeast

Indexed as

Genome, FungalSister Chromatid ExchangeMolecular BiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell AnalysischromosomesDNA repairdouble-strand breakgeneshomologous recombinationS. cerevisiaesingle cell sequencingsister chromatid exchangeStrand-seq

Identifiers

PMID29231811
PMCPMC5734873
OpenAlexW2773180188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.