Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29231168›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Multiple sources of slow activity fluctuations in a bacterial chemosensory network.

Remy Colin, Christelle Rosazza, Ady Vaknin, Victor Sourjik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nature physics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ChemotaxingArXiv · 2025
    Article
  6. ChemotaxingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A nonequilibrium allosteric model for receptor-kinase complexes: The role of energy dissipation in chemotaxis signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimal inference of molecular interaction dynamics in FRET microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Remy Colin *Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-8003
Christelle Rosazza *Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Ady VakninThe Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-4600
Victor SourjikMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-9192

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German-Israeli Project Cooperation AM441/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German-Israeli Project Cooperation SO568/1-1European Research Council 294761-MicRobE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular networks are intrinsically subject to stochastic fluctuations, but analysis of the resulting noise remained largely limited to gene expression. The pathway controlling chemotaxis of

Indexed as

Biological Variation, PopulationChemotaxisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMethylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReceptors, Cell SurfaceSingle-Cell AnalysisReceptors, Cell Surfacebacterial chemotaxiscell networks dynamicscomputational biologyE. colifluctuation dissipation relationinfectious diseaseLevy walksmicrobiologyout-of-equilibriumsingle-cell FRETsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID29231168
PMCPMC5809148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.