SynthesisJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019
Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The practices and strategies for implementing team-based learning in pre-clinical medical education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of online asthma training programmes to improve asthma management among school staff: a systematic review using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- Development and Implementation of an Online Education Program on Advanced Breast Cancer for European Cancer Nurses: ABC4Nurses Project: a Brief Report.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of mHealth and eHealth Tools in Improving Provider Knowledge, Confidence, and Behaviors Related to Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of end-stage renal disease communication skills training for healthcare personnel: a single-center, single-blind, randomized study.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- Exploring the Current Use of Educational Technologies in the Oncology Domain Across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Spaced learning versus traditional learning for pharmacists implementing β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026Article
- Learning effect of online versus onsite education in health and medical scholarship - protocol for a cluster randomized trial.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Enhancing occupational therapy education: Evaluating the impact of a STEAM-based assistive technology curriculum using Kirkpatrick's four-level model.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- An Innovation in Cancer Nursing Education Across Europe: A Pilot Evaluation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Exploring research engagement among nurses in a Magnet®-recognized cancer center: An analysis of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and influencing factors.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of single-credit traffic safety course based on Kirkpatrick model: a case study of Iran.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Development of an educational program for healthcare professionals who provide appearance care for patients with cancer: Feasibility study of an e-learning program.Global health & medicine · 2023Article
- The Multidomain Metaverse Cancer Care Digital Platform: Development and Usability Study.JMIR serious games · 2023Article
- Development of a Japanese Scale that Evaluates the Level of Nursing Support Provided to Patients for Decision-Making in Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Earlier cancer diagnosis in primary care: a feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!BJGP open · 2023Article
- Effect of the e-flipped learning approach on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceived behaviour of medical educators.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Digital Education for Health Professionals: An Evidence Map, Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners' requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick's four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29230687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.