Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29230658›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.

Shane P Prejean, Munaib Din, Eliana Reyes, Fadi G Hage

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and AHA guidance for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Bridging the Atlantic gap in clinical guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shane P PrejeanDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. sprejean@uabmc.edu.
Munaib DinThe PET imaging Centre at St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.
Eliana ReyesThe PET imaging Centre at St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.
Fadi G HageDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Guidelines in Review, we review side-by-side the recommendations provided by the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. We review the recommendations for imaging in the evaluation of patients with possible ACS followed by the diagnostic evaluation of patients with proven NSTE-ACS, based on their risk for adverse clinical events.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeHumansNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPractice Guidelines as Topiccoronary artery diseasenon-invasive imagingNon-ST elevation acute coronary syndromestress testing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.