ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2018
[Primary care reforms in Austria : Is there potential in the region of Tyrol?]
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the Austrian health care reform, a new policy is generally proposed to strengthen primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to illustrate the status quo in the Tyrolean PC system and to provide the opportunity to examine the reform feasibility. Therefore, a prospective cross-sectional study was performed among licensed GPs in Tyrol, using an online questionnaire. The results of the survey among 87 GPs show that only 20% of Tyrolean PC settings already fulfill the coreteam availabilty described in the reformplans. However, there are differences between urban and rural areas. The highest dissatisfaction was detected in the fields of administration, financing and appreciation of PC. Primarily there is a request by the GPs for implementation of group practices. Only few concerns about the proposed PC centers were noticed. It seems necessary to improve availability, especially outside the core times and during the night.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29230634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.