Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29230610›Full record

Trial reportMolecular and cellular biochemistry2018

Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Nataliya Babyshkina, Marina Zavyalova, Natalia Tarabanovskaya, Tatyana Dronova, Nadejda Krakhmal, Elena Slonimskaya, Julia Kzhyshkowska, Evgeny Choynzonov, Nadejda Cherdyntseva

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Influences in Breast Cancer Drug Resistance.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The impact ofGland surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nataliya BabyshkinaDepartment of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation. nbabyshkina@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-3878
Marina ZavyalovaDepartment of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Natalia TarabanovskayaDepartment of General Oncology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Cаncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Tatyana DronovaDepartment of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Nadejda KrakhmalDepartment of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Elena SlonimskayaDepartment of General Oncology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Cаncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Julia KzhyshkowskaDepartment of Translational Cellular and Molecular Biomedicine, National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Evgeny ChoynzonovFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Nadejda CherdyntsevaDepartment of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Саncеr Research Institute", Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RUSiberian State Medical University · RUTomsk National Research Medical Center · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of informative biomarkers that could predict the treatment response is particularly important in the triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, which is characterized by biological diversity. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2) expression and its gene polymorphisms on pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in Russian patients with TN breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 70 women with operable TN breast cancer, who underwent NCT with 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and capecitabine (CAX) between 2007 and 2013. VEGFR2 expression was evaluated before NCT by immunohistochemistry. TaqMan SNP assays were used for genotyping KDR - 604T>C (rs2071559) and KDR 1192G>A (rs2305948) polymorphisms. The pCR was used as an end-point in the treatment efficacy analysis. In the univariate analysis, the pCR rate was strongly associated with young age (P = 0.004), high Ki67 expression (P = 0.012), lymph node negativity (P = 0.023) as well as with positive VEGFR2 expression (P = 0.019) and the CAX regimen (P = 0.005). In the multivariate analysis, only patient's age (P = 0.005) and pre-NCT VEGFR2 expression (P = 0.048) remained significant predictors of pCR. The pCR rate was higher in the CAX-treated patients than that in the FAC-treated patients (P = 0.005). Our results revealed that - 604TT genotype of rs2071559 and age < 50 years were correlated with a pCR in the CAX-treated patients. VEGFR2 expression in pre-NCT tumors and KDR gene polymorphism can be considered as additional predictive molecular markers of pCR in Russian TN breast cancer patients treated with NCT.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2AdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesKDR protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Gene polymorphismsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic complete responsePredictive markersTriple-negative breast cancerVascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2)

Identifiers

PMID29230610
OpenAlexW2772833994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.