Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29230607›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2017

The effect of high count rates on cardiac perfusion quantification in a simultaneous PET-MR system using a cardiac perfusion phantom.

Jim O' Doherty, Zacharias Chalampalakis, Paul Schleyer, Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Amedeo Chiribiri, Paul K Marsden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. A retrospective evaluation of Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction for [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Assessment of a digital and an analog PET/CT system for accurate myocardial perfusion imaging with a flow phantom.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Assessment of left and right ventricular functional parameters using dynamic dual-tracer [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SimultaneousEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jim O' DohertyPET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. jodoherty@sidra.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-4485
Zacharias ChalampalakisPET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Paul SchleyerSiemens Healthineers UK, Frimley, Camberley, UK.
Muhummad Sohaib NazirBHF Centre of Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Wellcome Trust and EPSRC Medical Engineering Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Amedeo ChiribiriBHF Centre of Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Wellcome Trust and EPSRC Medical Engineering Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul K MarsdenPET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBSiemens (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

MICROCIRCULATORY CONTROL: DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF VASCULARITYF32HL008003 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI STRICK, DAVID M · 1988 to 1991
–
British Heart Foundation (GB) RE/08/003Medical Research Council MR/P01979X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (GB) WT 088641/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPET-MRI is under investigation as a new strategy for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. Consideration is required as to the maximum scanner count rate in order to limit dead-time losses resulting from administered activity in the scanner field of view during the first pass of the radiotracer.

resultsWe performed a decaying-source experiment to investigate the high count-rate performance of a PET-MR system (Siemens mMR) over the expected range of activities during a clinical study. We also performed imaging of a cardiac perfusion phantom, which provides an experimental simulation of clinical transit of a simultaneous radiotracer (phantom injected activities range 252 to 997 MBq) and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Time-activity and time-intensity curves of the aorta and myocardium compartments from PET and MR images were determined, and quantification of perfusion was then performed using a standard cardiac kinetic model. The decaying-source experiment showed a maximum noise equivalent count rate (NECR

conclusionsCare should be taken to avoid high count-rate losses in simultaneous PET-MRI studies. Based on our results in phantoms, bias in reconstructed images should be avoided by adhering to a singles rate lower than 64.9 Mcps on the mMR system. Quantification of perfusion values using singles rates higher than 64.9 Mcps on this system may be compromised and should be avoided.

Indexed as

Cardiac PETDead timePerfusionPET-MR

Identifiers

PMID29230607
PMCPMC5725400
OpenAlexW2771187820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.