Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29230518›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks.

Bülent Cengiz, Doğa Vurallı, Murat Zinnuroğlu, Gözde Bayer, Hassan Golmohammadzadeh, Zafer Günendi, Ali Emre Turgut, Bülent İrfanoğlu, Kutluk Bilge Arıkan

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06209632 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Mirror Therapy Combined With Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation on Functional Recovery and Neuroplasticity in Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled7ConditionsPeripheral Nerve InjuryArmsmirror therapy, contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, conventional physiotherapy
NCT06209801 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Mirror Therapy Integrated With Electrical Stimulation and Motor Imagery on Cortical Modulations in Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injury and Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled32ConditionsPeripheral Nerve InjuriesArmsMirror therapy, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Motor imagery
NCT07077460 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Hand Rehabilitation System With Synchronized Contralateral Haptic Feedback

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsHealthy ElderlyArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror), Graded-Pressure Haptic Device (Passive press-feedback cushion)
NCT07150325 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke PatientsArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low-Cost Robotic Guide Based on a Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface for Arm Assisted Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bülent CengizMotor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Beşevler, 06500, Ankara, Turkey. bcengiz@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-1688-9516
Doğa VurallıMotor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Beşevler, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat ZinnuroğluMotor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Beşevler, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Gözde BayerDepartment of Bioengineering, Institute of Natural Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Hassan GolmohammadzadehCognitive Robotics Research Lab., Department of Mechatronics, Atilim University, Incek, Ankara, Turkey.
Zafer GünendiMotor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Beşevler, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Ali Emre TurgutDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Dumlupinar Bulvari, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Bülent İrfanoğluCognitive Robotics Research Lab., Department of Mechatronics, Atilim University, Incek, Ankara, Turkey.
Kutluk Bilge ArıkanCognitive Robotics Research Lab., Department of Mechatronics, Atilim University, Incek, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 114E621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between action observation (AO)-related corticomotor excitability changes and phases of observed action and to explore the effects of pure AO and concurrent AO and motor imagery (MI) state on corticomotor excitability using TMS. It was also investigated whether the mirror neuron system activity is muscle-specific. Fourteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. EMG recordings were taken from the right first dorsal interosseous and the abductor digiti minimi muscles. There was a significant main effect of TMS timing (after the beginning of the movement, at the beginning of motor output state, and during black screen) on the mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Mean MEP amplitudes for AO combined with MI were significantly higher than pure AO session. There was a significant interaction between session and TMS timing. There was no significant main effect of muscle on MEP amplitude. The results indicate that corticomotor excitability is modulated by different phases of the observed motor movement and this modulation is not muscle-specific. Simultaneous MI and AO enhance corticomotor excitability significantly compared to pure AO.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFeedback, SensoryFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImaginationMaleMirror NeuronsMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAction observationCorticomotor excitabilityMotor imageryTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.