ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
From Genes to Ecosystems in Microbiology: Modeling Approaches and the Importance of Individuality.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of the Lotka-Volterra model fails in strongly coupled microbial consumer-resource systems.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- More realistic plankton simulation models will improve projections of ocean ecosystem responses to global change.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Review
- Individual-based modeling unravels spatial and social interactions in bacterial communities.The ISME journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- "Bet hedging" against climate change in developing and adult animals: roles for stochastic gene expression, phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic inheritance and adaptation.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Individual-Based Modeling of Spatial Dynamics of Chemotactic Microbial Populations.ACS synthetic biology · 2022Article
- ChemChaste: Simulating spatially inhomogeneous biochemical reaction-diffusion systems for modeling cell-environment feedbacks.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Mining Synergistic Microbial Interactions: A Roadmap on How to Integrate Multi-Omics Data.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Application of Machine Learning Techniques to an Agent-Based Model ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Anthropogenic and Environmental Constraints on the Microbial Methane Cycle in Coastal Sediments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Metabolic modelling approaches for describing and engineering microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Future directions for studying resilience of the oral ecosystem.British dental journal · 2020Article
- Toward Engineering Biosystems With Emergent Collective Functions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- INDISIM-Denitrification, an individual-based model for study the denitrification process.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2020Article
- Gut microbiota ecology: Biodiversity estimated from hybrid neutral-niche model increases with health status and aging.PloS one · 2020Article
- Augmenting Biogas Process Modeling by Resolving Intracellular Metabolic Activity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- FLYCOP: metabolic modeling-based analysis and engineering microbial communities.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Extreme Osmotolerance and Halotolerance in Food-Relevant Yeasts and the Role of Glycerol-Dependent Cell Individuality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Models are important tools in microbial ecology. They can be used to advance understanding by helping to interpret observations and test hypotheses, and to predict the effects of ecosystem management actions or a different climate. Over the past decades, biological knowledge and ecosystem observations have advanced to the molecular and in particular gene level. However, microbial ecology models have changed less and a current challenge is to make them utilize the knowledge and observations at the genetic level. We review published models that explicitly consider genes and make predictions at the population or ecosystem level. The models can be grouped into three general approaches, i.e., metabolic flux, gene-centric and agent-based. We describe and contrast these approaches by applying them to a hypothetical ecosystem and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. An important distinguishing feature is how variation between individual cells (individuality) is handled. In microbial ecosystems, individual heterogeneity is generated by a number of mechanisms including stochastic interactions of molecules (e.g., gene expression), stochastic and deterministic cell division asymmetry, small-scale environmental heterogeneity, and differential transport in a heterogeneous environment. This heterogeneity can then be amplified and transferred to other cell properties by several mechanisms, including nutrient uptake, metabolism and growth, cell cycle asynchronicity and the effects of age and damage. For example, stochastic gene expression may lead to heterogeneity in nutrient uptake enzyme levels, which in turn results in heterogeneity in intracellular nutrient levels. Individuality can have important ecological consequences, including division of labor, bet hedging, aging and sub-optimality. Understanding the importance of individuality and the mechanism(s) underlying it for the specific microbial system and question investigated is essential for selecting the optimal modeling strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.