Article in Journal of poverty, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Jane K Burke-MillerHektoen Institute of Medicine, 2240 W. Ogden Ave, 2 Floor, Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Kathleen WeberRuth M. Rothstein CORE Center, Cook County Bureau of Health Services, 2020 W. Harrison St., Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Susan E CohnNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E. Superior St., Chicago IL 60611 USA.
Ronald C HershowUniversity of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, 1601 W. Taylor St., Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Beverly ShaRush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina St., Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Audrey L FrenchRuth M. Rothstein CORE Center, Cook County Bureau of Health Services, 2020 W. Harrison St., Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Mardge H CohenStroger Hospital, Cook County Bureau of Health Services, Chicago IL 60612 USA.
Funding
Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS-V)U01AI035004 · NIAID · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI ANASTOS, KATHRYN M., SHARMA, ANJALI · 1993 to 2018
$65.7M
WOMEN'S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY ORGANIZATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONSU01AI034989 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AOUIZERAT, BRADLEY E, GREENBLATT, RUTH MARTHA · 1993 to 2018
$65.6M
Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) IIIU01AI031834 · NIAID · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUSTAFSON, DEBORAH R., MINKOFF, HOWARD · 1998 to 2018
$53.5M
WOMEN'S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY (WIHS) ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENTU01AI034994 · NIAID · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI KASSAYE, SEBLE G · 1993 to 2018
$52.0M
Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) IV, Chicago ConsortiumU01AI034993 · NIAID · HEKTOEN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI COHEN, MARDGE H, FRENCH, AUDREY · 1994 to 2018
$51.0M
WOMENS INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY (WIHS)U01HD032632 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MILAM, JOEL E · 1994 to 2012
$42.0M
WIHS DATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS CENTER(WDMAC)U01AI042590 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GANGE, STEPHEN J, GOLUB, ELIZABETH T · 1998 to 2018
$38.4M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Emory WIHS CRS - Longitudinal CohortU01AI103408 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OFOTOKUN, IGHOVWERHA, WINGOOD, GINA MARIA · 2013 to 2018
$14.1M
UAB-MISS WIHS CohortU01AI103401 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KEMPF, MIRJAM-COLETTE, KONKLE-PARKER, DEBORAH J · 2013 to 2018
$11.2M
University of North Carolina Womens Interagency HIV Study UNC WIHSU01AI103390 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ADIMORA, ADAORA A · 2013 to 2018
The study of neighborhood disadvantage and health relies on census socioeconomic data but would benefit from reliable survey measures of factors that influence health within low income communities. The Perceptions of Neighborhood Environment Scale (PNES) was developed for use in the general U.S. population, and its measurement properties in a cohort of low-income urban women living with or at risk for HIV are described. The scale and all but one subscale have good psychometric and ecometric reliability, as well as convergent, construct, and concurrent validity, and are not collinear with household and community area income in low-income urban neighborhoods.
Indexed as
genderHIV/AIDSHLMpoverty measurementsurvey research
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Measurement of Neighborhood Context in an Urban Cohort of HIV-infected or at risk Low-Income Women. · full record | OpenQuestion