Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229938›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Exploiting Anopheles responses to thermal, odour and visual stimuli to improve surveillance and control of malaria.

Frances M Hawkes, Roch K Dabiré, Simon P Sawadogo, Stephen J Torr, Gabriella Gibson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Laboratory Evaluation of Synthetic Attractants forJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frances M HawkesNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, United Kingdom. f.m.hawkes@greenwich.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-3702
Roch K DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, 01 BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Simon P SawadogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, 01 BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Stephen J TorrLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, United Kingdom.
Gabriella GibsonNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, United Kingdom.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFNatural Resources Institute · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P025404/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito surveillance and control are at the heart of efforts to eliminate malaria, however, there remain significant gaps in our understanding of mosquito behaviour that impede innovation. We hypothesised that a combination of human-associated stimuli could be used to attract and kill malaria vectors more successfully than individual stimuli, and at least as well as a real human. To test this in the field, we quantified Anopheles responses to olfactory, visual and thermal stimuli in Burkina Faso using a simple adhesive trap. Traps baited with human odour plus high contrast visual stimuli caught more Anopheles than traps with odour alone, showing that despite their nocturnal habit, malaria vectors make use of visual cues in host-seeking. The best performing traps, however, combined odour and visual stimuli with a thermal signature in the range equivalent to human body temperature. When tested against a human landing catch during peak mosquito abundance, this "host decoy" trap caught nearly ten times the number of Anopheles mosquitoes caught by a human collector. Exploiting the behavioural responses of mosquitoes to the entire suite of host stimuli promises to revolutionise vector surveillance and provide new paradigms in disease control.

Indexed as

OdorantsPhotic StimulationTemperatureAnimalsAnophelesBehavior, AnimalHumansMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID29229938
PMCPMC5725576
OpenAlexW2772645041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.