Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229936›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Identification of a gene signature for discriminating metastatic from primary melanoma using a molecular interaction network approach.

Rahul Metri, Abhilash Mohan, Jérémie Nsengimana, Joanna Pozniak, Carmen Molina-Paris, Julia Newton-Bishop, David Bishop, Nagasuma Chandra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MOFR: Multi-omics Feature Reconstruction for Cancer Classification and Metastasis Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic effects on the skin methylome in healthy older twins.American journal of human genetics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. VBEBioMedicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rahul MetriIISc Mathematics Initiative (IMI), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Abhilash MohanDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jérémie NsengimanaSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Joanna PozniakSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Carmen Molina-ParisDepartment of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Julia Newton-BishopSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David BishopSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-8785
Nagasuma ChandraIISc Mathematics Initiative (IMI), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. nchandra@iisc.ac.in.
University of Leeds · GBIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10589Cancer Research UK 11963Cancer Research UK 19167Cancer Research UK C588/A19167Cancer Research UK C8216/A6129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the biological factors that are characteristic of metastasis in melanoma remains a key approach to improving treatment. In this study, we seek to identify a gene signature of metastatic melanoma. We configured a new network-based computational pipeline, combined with a machine learning method, to mine publicly available transcriptomic data from melanoma patient samples. Our method is unbiased and scans a genome-wide protein-protein interaction network using a novel formulation for network scoring. Using this, we identify the most influential, differentially expressed nodes in metastatic as compared to primary melanoma. We evaluated the shortlisted genes by a machine learning method to rank them by their discriminatory capacities. From this, we identified a panel of 6 genes, ALDH1A1, HSP90AB1, KIT, KRT16, SPRR3 and TMEM45B whose expression values discriminated metastatic from primary melanoma (87% classification accuracy). In an independent transcriptomic data set derived from 703 primary melanomas, we showed that all six genes were significant in predicting melanoma specific survival (MSS) in a univariate analysis, which was also consistent with AJCC staging. Further, 3 of these genes, HSP90AB1, SPRR3 and KRT16 remained significant predictors of MSS in a joint analysis (HR = 2.3, P = 0.03) although, HSP90AB1 (HR = 1.9, P = 2 × 10

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorHumansMelanomaPrognosisProtein Interaction MapsRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29229936
PMCPMC5725601
OpenAlexW2768279137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.