Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229825›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Network analysis identifies chromosome intermingling regions as regulatory hotspots for transcription.

Anastasiya Belyaeva, Saradha Venkatachalapathy, Mallika Nagarajan, G V Shivashankar, Caroline Uhler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Long-distance association of topological boundaries through nuclear condensates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Science advances · 2022
    Article
  12. Chromatin Hubs: A biological and computational outlook.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of forces on chromatin.APL bioengineering · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anastasiya BelyaevaLaboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Saradha VenkatachalapathyMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.
Mallika NagarajanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.
G V ShivashankarMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.
Caroline UhlerLaboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; cuhler@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-0216

Funding

Graduate Training in Computational and Systems BiologyT32GM087237 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BURGE, CHRISTOPHER B · 2009 to 2023
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM087237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 3D structure of the genome plays a key role in regulatory control of the cell. Experimental methods such as high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) have been developed to probe the 3D structure of the genome. However, it remains a challenge to deduce from these data chromosome regions that are colocalized and coregulated. Here, we present an integrative approach that leverages 1D functional genomic features (e.g., epigenetic marks) with 3D interactions from Hi-C data to identify functional interchromosomal interactions. We construct a weighted network with 250-kb genomic regions as nodes and Hi-C interactions as edges, where the edge weights are given by the correlation between 1D genomic features. Individual interacting clusters are determined using weighted correlation clustering on the network. We show that intermingling regions generally fall into either active or inactive clusters based on the enrichment for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and H3K9me3, respectively. We show that active clusters are hotspots for transcription factor binding sites. We also validate our predictions experimentally by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments and show that active RNAPII is enriched in predicted active clusters. Our method provides a general quantitative framework that couples 1D genomic features with 3D interactions from Hi-C to probe the guiding principles that link the spatial organization of the genome with regulatory control.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanAnimalsHumansSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, Genetic3D FISHchromosome interminglingepigeneticsHi-Cnetwork and clustering analysis

Identifiers

PMID29229825
PMCPMC5748172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.