Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229806›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

How reduced excitonic coupling enhances light harvesting in the main photosynthetic antennae of diatoms.

Tjaart P J Krüger, Pavel Malý, Maxime T A Alexandre, Tomáš Mančal, Claudia Büchel, Rienk van Grondelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Real-Time Feedback-Driven Single-Particle Tracking: A Survey and Perspective.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tjaart P J KrügerDepartment of Physics, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa; tjaart.kruger@up.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-6512
Pavel MalýDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9244-9718
Maxime T A AlexandreDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tomáš MančalFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Claudia BüchelInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Department of Biosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Rienk van GrondelleDepartment of Physics, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong excitonic interactions are a key design strategy in photosynthetic light harvesting, expanding the spectral cross-section for light absorption and creating considerably faster and more robust excitation energy transfer. These molecular excitons are a direct result of exceptionally densely packed pigments in photosynthetic proteins. The main light-harvesting complexes of diatoms, known as fucoxanthin-chlorophyll proteins (FCPs), are an exception, displaying surprisingly weak excitonic coupling between their chlorophyll (Chl)

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisDiatomsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesLight-Harvesting Protein Complexesfucoxanthin–chlorophyll proteinlight-harvesting complexphotosynthetic excitonsprotein disordersingle-molecule spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID29229806
PMCPMC5748208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.