ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018
Subtle changes at the variable domain interface of the T-cell receptor can strongly increase affinity.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-ethnic reference map of T cell receptor germline diversity reveals evidence of natural selection on alpha chain genes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep Mutational Scanning in Immunology: Techniques and Applications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- TRAIT: A Comprehensive Database for T-cell Receptor-antigen Interactions.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Engineering the T cell receptor for fun and profit: Uncovering complex biology, interrogating the immune system, and targeting disease.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Rapid screening of TCR-pMHC interactions by the YAMTAD system.Cell discovery · 2022Article
- ReliableJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Engineering Proteins by Combining Deep Mutational Scanning and Yeast Display.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Engineering soluble T-cell receptors for therapy.The FEBS journal · 2021Review
- Avidity optimization of a MAGE-A1-specific TCR with somatic hypermutation.European journal of immunology · 2021Article
- An Engineered T Cell Receptor Variant Realizes the Limits of Functional Binding Modes.Biochemistry · 2020Article
- Molecular Rules Underpinning Enhanced Affinity Binding of Human T Cell Receptors Engineered for Immunotherapy.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2020Article
- T-cell receptor affinity in the age of cancer immunotherapy.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2020Review
- Structure-guided engineering of the affinity and specificity of CARs against Tn-glycopeptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Stabilization of soluble high-affinity T-cell receptor with de novo disulfide bonds.FEBS letters · 2020Article
- Preferential HLA-B27 Allorecognition Displayed by Multiple Cross-Reactive Antiviral CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- T-cell Receptors EngineeredCancer immunology research · 2019Article
- High-Throughput Stability Screening of Neoantigen/HLA Complexes Improves Immunogenicity Predictions.Cancer immunology research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most affinity-maturation campaigns for antibodies and T-cell receptors (TCRs) operate on the residues at the binding site, located within the loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Accordingly, mutations in contact residues, or so-called "second shell" residues, that increase affinity are typically identified by directed evolution involving combinatorial libraries. To determine the impact of residues located at a distance from the binding site, here we used single-codon libraries of both CDR and non-CDR residues to generate a deep mutational scan of a human TCR against the cancer antigen MART-1·HLA-A2. Non-CDR residues included those at the interface of the TCR variable domains (Vα and Vβ) and surface-exposed framework residues. Mutational analyses showed that both Vα/Vβ interface and CDR residues were important in maintaining binding to MART-1·HLA-A2, probably due to either structural requirements for proper Vα/Vβ association or direct contact with the ligand. More surprisingly, many Vα/Vβ interface substitutions yielded improved binding to MART-1·HLA-A2. To further explore this finding, we constructed interface libraries and selected them for improved stability or affinity. Among the variants identified, one conservative substitution (F45βY) was most prevalent. Further analysis of F45βY showed that it enhanced thermostability and increased affinity by 60-fold. Thus, introducing a single hydroxyl group at the Vα/Vβ interface, at a significant distance from the TCR·peptide·MHC-binding site, remarkably affected ligand binding. The variant retained a high degree of specificity for MART-1·HLA-A2, indicating that our approach provides a general strategy for engineering improvements in either soluble or cell-based TCRs for therapeutic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.