Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229779›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Subtle changes at the variable domain interface of the T-cell receptor can strongly increase affinity.

Preeti Sharma, David M Kranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ReliableJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  7. Engineering Proteins by Combining Deep Mutational Scanning and Yeast Display.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Structure-guided engineering of the affinity and specificity of CARs against Tn-glycopeptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. T-cell Receptors EngineeredCancer immunology research · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Preeti SharmaFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
David M KranzFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 d-kranz@illinois.edu.

Funding

Engineering T Cell Receptors for Adoptive Cell TherapiesR01CA178844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KRANZ, DAVID M. · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Influence of structurally related self-peptides on T cell-mediated therapiesR21CA187592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KRANZ, DAVID M. · 2015 to 2016
$337k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178844NCI NIH HHS R21 CA187592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most affinity-maturation campaigns for antibodies and T-cell receptors (TCRs) operate on the residues at the binding site, located within the loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Accordingly, mutations in contact residues, or so-called "second shell" residues, that increase affinity are typically identified by directed evolution involving combinatorial libraries. To determine the impact of residues located at a distance from the binding site, here we used single-codon libraries of both CDR and non-CDR residues to generate a deep mutational scan of a human TCR against the cancer antigen MART-1·HLA-A2. Non-CDR residues included those at the interface of the TCR variable domains (Vα and Vβ) and surface-exposed framework residues. Mutational analyses showed that both Vα/Vβ interface and CDR residues were important in maintaining binding to MART-1·HLA-A2, probably due to either structural requirements for proper Vα/Vβ association or direct contact with the ligand. More surprisingly, many Vα/Vβ interface substitutions yielded improved binding to MART-1·HLA-A2. To further explore this finding, we constructed interface libraries and selected them for improved stability or affinity. Among the variants identified, one conservative substitution (F45βY) was most prevalent. Further analysis of F45βY showed that it enhanced thermostability and increased affinity by 60-fold. Thus, introducing a single hydroxyl group at the Vα/Vβ interface, at a significant distance from the TCR·peptide·MHC-binding site, remarkably affected ligand binding. The variant retained a high degree of specificity for MART-1·HLA-A2, indicating that our approach provides a general strategy for engineering improvements in either soluble or cell-based TCRs for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

Binding SitesComplementarity Determining RegionsHLA-A2 AntigenHumansMART-1 AntigenProtein BindingRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeComplementarity Determining RegionsHLA-A2 AntigenMART-1 AntigenRecombinant Proteinsdeep sequencingdirected evolutionmajor histocompatibility complex (MHC)protein engineeringprotein-protein interactionsingle-codon librariesT-cell receptor (TCR)yeast display

Identifiers

PMID29229779
PMCPMC5798310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.