Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229712›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2017

Payment incentives for community-based psychiatric care in Ontario, Canada.

David Rudoler, Claire de Oliveira, Joyce Cheng, Paul Kurdyak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Closed for Business? Using a Mixture Model to Explore the Supply of Psychiatric Care for New Patients.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019
    Article
  12. Aligning innovations in health funding with innovations in care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  13. Financial incentives for physicians to improve health care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David RudolerInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Mental Health and Addictions Research Program (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine (Kurdyak) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. david.rudoler@uoit.ca.
Claire de OliveiraInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Mental Health and Addictions Research Program (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine (Kurdyak) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Joyce ChengInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Mental Health and Addictions Research Program (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine (Kurdyak) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Paul KurdyakInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Mental Health and Addictions Research Program (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng, Kurdyak), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine (Kurdyak) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Rudoler, de Oliveira, Cheng), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn September 2011, the government of Ontario implemented payment incentives to encourage the delivery of community-based psychiatric care to patients after discharge from a psychiatric hospital admission and to those with a recent suicide attempt. We evaluated whether these incentives affected supply of psychiatric services and access to care.

methodsWe used administrative data to capture monthly observations for all psychiatrists who practised in Ontario between September 2009 and August 2014. We conducted interrupted time-series analyses of psychiatrist-level and patient-level data to evaluate whether the incentives affected the quantity of eligible outpatient services delivered and the likelihood of receiving follow-up care.

resultsAmong 1921 psychiatrists evaluated, implementation of the incentive payments was not associated with increased provision of follow-up visits after discharge from a psychiatric hospital admission (mean change in visits per month per psychiatrist 0.0099, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0989 to 0.1206; change in trend 0.0032, 95% CI -0.0035 to 0.0095) or after a suicide attempt (mean change -0.0910, 95% CI -0.1885 to 0.0026; change in trend 0.0102, 95% CI 0.0045 to 0.0159). There was also no change in the probability that patients received follow-up care after discharge (change in level -0.0079, 95% CI -0.0223 to 0.0061; change in trend 0.0007, 95% CI -0.0003 to 0.0016) or after a suicide attempt (change in level 0.0074, 95% CI -0.0094 to 0.0366; change in trend 0.0006, 95% CI -0.0007 to 0.0022).

interpretationOur results suggest that implementation of the incentives did not increase access to follow-up care for patients after discharge from a psychiatric hospital admission or after a suicide attempt, and the incentives had no effect on supply of psychiatric services. Further research to guide design and implementation of more effective incentives is warranted.

Indexed as

MotivationPsychiatryReimbursement, IncentiveAftercareAmbulatory CareCommunity Mental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOntario

Identifiers

PMID29229712
PMCPMC5718890
OpenAlexW2772492721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.