Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229591›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Clinic Versus Online Social Network-Delivered Lifestyle Interventions: Protocol for the Get Social Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Monica L Wang, Molly E Waring, Danielle E Jake-Schoffman, Jessica L Oleski, Zachary Michaels, Jared M Goetz, Stephenie C Lemon, Yunsheng Ma, Sherry L Pagoto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02646618 (Get Social), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02646618 nacompletednot on this map

Get Social: Randomized Trial of a Social Network Delivered Lifestyle Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ConnecticutRan2016 to 2020Enrolled329ConditionsWeight LossArmsGet Social, Traditional, Smartphone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica L WangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-5072
Molly E WaringDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-9824
Danielle E Jake-SchoffmanDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6381-7323
Jessica L OleskiDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-2302
Zachary MichaelsDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-4728
Jared M GoetzDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-8690
Stephenie C LemonDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-6070
Yunsheng MaDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-3716
Sherry L PagotoDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2462-8797

Funding

Get Social: Randomized Trial of a Social Network Delivered Lifestyle InterventionR01DK103944 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PAGOTO, SHERRY L. · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
Implementation Research Training Program in Cancer Prevention and ControlR25CA172009 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HOUSTON, THOMAS K, LEMON, STEPHENIE C. · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Mentoring in mHealth and Social Networking Interventions for CVD Risk ReductionK24HL124366 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PAGOTO, SHERRY L. · 2015 to 2024
$1.1M
A culturally-tailored narrative intervention to target disparities in obesityK01DK102447 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WANG, MONICA L. · 2014 to 2018
$631k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA172009NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL124366NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK102447NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline social networks may be a promising modality to deliver lifestyle interventions by reducing cost and burden. Although online social networks have been integrated as one component of multimodality lifestyle interventions, no randomized trials to date have compared a lifestyle intervention delivered entirely via online social network with a traditional clinic-delivered intervention.

objectiveThis paper describes the design and methods of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial, testing (1) whether a lifestyle intervention delivered entirely through an online social network would produce weight loss that would not be appreciably worse than that induced by a traditional clinic-based lifestyle intervention among overweight and obese adults and (2) whether the former would do so at a lower cost.

methodsAdults with body mass index (BMI) between 27 and 45 kg/m

resultsThe final wave of data collection is expected to conclude in June 2019. Data analysis will take place in the months following and is expected to be complete in September 2019.

conclusionsFindings will extend the literature by revealing whether delivering a lifestyle intervention via an online social network is an effective alternative to the traditional modality of clinic visits, given the former might be more scalable and feasible to implement in settings that cannot support clinic-based models.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02646618; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02646618 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6v20waTFW).

Indexed as

life stylemethodsobesityrandomized controlled trialsocial supportweight loss

Identifiers

PMID29229591
PMCPMC5742659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.