Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229405›Full record

ArticleMedical engineering & physics2018

Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.

Eric C Swanson, Jake B McLean, Katheryn J Allyn, Christian B Redd, Joan E Sanders

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04494555 (Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04494555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrooke Army Medical CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsAmputation StumpArmsStatic socket, User adjusted socket, Microprocessor-adjusting sockets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. COVID-19: A catalyst for change in virtual health care utilization for persons with limb loss.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Power Wheelchair Footplate Pressure and Positioning Sensor.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric C SwansonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Electronic address: eswanso3@uw.edu.
Jake B McLeanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Electronic address: jakemc@uw.edu.
Katheryn J AllynDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Electronic address: kate@allyn.org.
Christian B ReddDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Electronic address: credd@uw.edu.
Joan E SandersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Electronic address: jsanders@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Socket design, limb health and ability to ambulateR01HD069387 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SANDERS, JOAN E. · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this research was to investigate a strategy for designing and fabricating computer-manufactured socket inserts that were embedded with sensors for field monitoring of limb-socket interactions of prosthetic users. An instrumented insert was fabricated for a single trans-tibial prosthesis user that contained three sensor types (proximity sensor, force sensing resistor, and inductive sensor), and the system was evaluated through a sequence of laboratory clinical tests and two days of field use. During in-lab tests 3 proximity sensors accurately distinguish between don and doff states; 3 of 4 force sensing resistors measured gradual pressure increases as weight-bearing increased; and the inductive sensor indicated that as prosthetic socks were added the limb moved farther out of the socket and pistoning amplitude decreased. Multiple sensor types were necessary in analysis of field collected data to interpret how sock changes affected limb-socket interactions. Instrumented socket inserts, with sensors selected to match clinical questions of interest, have the potential to provide important insights to improve patient care.

Indexed as

Amputation StumpsExtremitiesAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansMalePressureProsthesis DesignWeight-BearingCAD/CAMInterfacial sensorsLower-limb amputeeProsthetic socketResidual limbSocket fit

Identifiers

PMID29229405
PMCPMC5748260
OpenAlexW2771797168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.