Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29229152›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2018

Omission of radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery in the postneoadjuvant setting.

Andrew C Esposito, James Crawford, Elin R Sigurdson, Elizabeth A Handorf, Shelly B Hayes, Marcia Boraas, Richard J Bleicher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C EspositoLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
James CrawfordDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elin R SigurdsonLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elizabeth A HandorfDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shelly B HayesLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Marcia BoraasLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard J BleicherLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: richard.bleicher@fccc.edu.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast conservation therapy (BCT) consists of breast conservation surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can downstage tumors, broadening BCS eligibility in patients requiring mastectomy. However, tumor downstaging does not obviate need for RT. This study evaluated factors that predict RT omission after NACT and BCS.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for women with unilateral, clinical stage II-III breast cancer, treated with NACT and BCS between 2008 and 2012. Patients not receiving RT after NACT and BCS were identified. A subgroup analysis was performed eliminating patients for whom RT was recommended but not received.

resultsAmong 10,220 patients meeting study eligibility, 974 (9.53%) did not receive RT after BCS. Predictors of RT omission included older age, insurance status, facility type, facility region, more recent year of diagnosis, receptor status unknown, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status positive or unknown, and positive margins. Factors increasing the likelihood of RT receipt included cN3 disease, receptor positivity, and primary downstaging. Race, Hispanicity, education, income, comorbidities, rural versus urban setting, histology, grade, and nodal stage change were not associated with RT omission. When excluding the 314 patients for whom RT was recommended but not received, age, Medicaid insurance, facility type, facility region, receptor status unknown, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status unknown, and positive margins were predictors of RT omission.

conclusionsRace, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status were not predictors of RT omission. It remains unclear whether omission of RT in some cases is due to lack of physician knowledge. Further efforts are needed to ensure that physicians and patients recognize that RT is a vital and required part of BCT, even after NACT.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRadiotherapyRetrospective StudiesBreast neoplasmsBreast/surgeryNeoadjuvant therapyRadiotherapySegmental mastectomyStandard of care

Identifiers

PMID29229152
PMCPMC5729922
OpenAlexW2774282417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.