Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228998›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

Capturing health and eating status through a nutritional perception screening questionnaire (NPSQ9) in a randomised internet-based personalised nutrition intervention: the Food4Me study.

Rodrigo San-Cristobal, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Carlos Celis-Morales, Katherine M Livingstone, Barbara Stewart-Knox, Audrey Rankin, Anna L Macready, Rosalind Fallaize, Clare B O'Donovan, Hannah Forster and 19 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01530139 (Personalised Nutrition), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01530139 nacompletednot on this map

Personalised Nutrition: An Integrative Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewcastle UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled1,607ConditionsDietary ModificationArmsLevel 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 0
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrative development of a short screening questionnaire of highly processed food consumption (sQ-HPF).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Rodrigo San-CristobalCentre for Nutrition Research, Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea, 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Santiago Navas-CarreteroCentre for Nutrition Research, Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea, 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. snavas@unav.es.
Carlos Celis-MoralesHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Katherine M LivingstoneHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Barbara Stewart-KnoxSchool of Psychology, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD71DP, UK.
Audrey RankinNorthern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
Anna L MacreadyHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AA, UK.
Rosalind FallaizeHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AA, UK.
Clare B O'DonovanUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Hannah ForsterUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Clara WoolheadUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Marianne C WalshUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Christina P LambrinouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 17671, Athens, Greece.
George MoschonisDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Miroslaw JaroszInstitute of Food and Nutrition (IZZ), 02-903, Warsaw, Poland.
Hannelore DanielZIEL Research Center of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Biochemistry Unit, Technische Universität München, 85354, Munich, Germany.
Eileen R GibneyUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Lorraine BrennanUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Thomas E GundersenVitas Ltd., Oslo Science Park, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Christian A DrevonDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Mike GibneyUCD Institute of Food and Health, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Republic of Ireland.
Cyril F M MarsauxDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Wim H M SarisDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Julie A LovegroveHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AA, UK.
Lynn J FrewerFood and Society Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
John C MathersHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
J Alfredo MartinezCentre for Nutrition Research, Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea, 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Food4Me Study
University College Dublin · IEHarokopio University of Athens · GRMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLNewcastle University · GBUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversity of Reading · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstytut Zywnosci Zywienia · PLMadrid Institute for Advanced Studies · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ESUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines emphasize healthy eating to promote wellbeing and prevention of non-communicable diseases. The perceived healthiness of food is determined by many factors affecting food intake. A positive perception of healthy eating has been shown to be associated with greater diet quality. Internet-based methodologies allow contact with large populations. Our present study aims to design and evaluate a short nutritional perception questionnaire, to be used as a screening tool for assessing nutritional status, and to predict an optimal level of personalisation in nutritional advice delivered via the Internet.

methodsData from all participants who were screened and then enrolled into the Food4Me proof-of-principle study (n = 2369) were used to determine the optimal items for inclusion in a novel screening tool, the Nutritional Perception Screening Questionnaire-9 (NPSQ9). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on anthropometric and biochemical data and on dietary indices acquired from participants who had completed the Food4Me dietary intervention (n = 1153). Baseline and intervention data were analysed using linear regression and linear mixed regression, respectively.

resultsA final model with 9 NPSQ items was validated against the dietary intervention data. NPSQ9 scores were inversely associated with BMI (β = -0.181, p < 0.001) and waist circumference (Β = -0.155, p < 0.001), and positively associated with total carotenoids (β = 0.198, p < 0.001), omega-3 fatty acid index (β = 0.155, p < 0.001), Healthy Eating Index (HEI) (β = 0.299, p < 0.001) and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) (β = 0. 279, p < 0.001). Findings from the longitudinal intervention study showed a greater reduction in BMI and improved dietary indices among participants with lower NPSQ9 scores.

conclusionsHealthy eating perceptions and dietary habits captured by the NPSQ9 score, based on nine questionnaire items, were associated with reduced body weight and improved diet quality. Likewise, participants with a lower score achieved greater health improvements than those with higher scores, in response to personalised advice, suggesting that NPSQ9 may be used for early evaluation of nutritional status and to tailor nutritional advice.

trial registrationNCT01530139 .

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdultAnthropometryBody WeightDiet, MediterraneanEatingFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionFood4MeHealthy eating indexMediterranean diet scoreNPSQ9Nutritional statusPersonalised nutritionSurvey

Identifiers

PMID29228998
PMCPMC5725967
OpenAlexW2767355984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.