Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29228991›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

The rumen microbiome as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity genes is directly affected by diet in beef cattle.

Marc D Auffret, Richard J Dewhurst, Carol-Anne Duthie, John A Rooke, R John Wallace, Tom C Freeman, Robert Stewart, Mick Watson, Rainer Roehe

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 124 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Replacing Whole-Crop Maize Silage withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marc D AuffretSRUC, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK. Marc.Auffret@sruc.ac.uk.
Richard J DewhurstSRUC, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Carol-Anne DuthieSRUC, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
John A RookeSRUC, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
R John WallaceRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Tom C FreemanDivision of Genetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Robert StewartEdinburgh Genomics, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Mick WatsonDivision of Genetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Rainer RoeheSRUC, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Scotland's Rural College · GBEdinburgh Genomics · GBGenomics (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001107/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N01720X/1 and BB/N016742/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211551Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance is the most urgent current threat to human and animal health. An improved understanding of the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes and genes associated with microbial colonisation and pathogenicity in the animal gut will have a major role in reducing the contribution of animal production to this problem. Here, the influence of diet on the ruminal resistome and abundance of pathogenicity genes was assessed in ruminal digesta samples taken from 50 antibiotic-free beef cattle, comprising four cattle breeds receiving two diets containing different proportions of concentrate.

resultsTwo hundred and four genes associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR), colonisation, communication or pathogenicity functions were identified from 4966 metagenomic genes using KEGG identification. Both the diversity and abundance of these genes were higher in concentrate-fed animals. Chloramphenicol and microcin resistance genes were dominant in samples from forage-fed animals (P < 0.001), while aminoglycoside and streptomycin resistances were enriched in concentrate-fed animals. The concentrate-based diet also increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, which includes many animal and zoonotic pathogens. A high ratio of Proteobacteria to (Firmicutes + Bacteroidetes) was confirmed as a good indicator for rumen dysbiosis, with eight cases all from concentrate-fed animals. Finally, network analysis demonstrated that the resistance/pathogenicity genes are potentially useful as biomarkers for health risk assessment of the ruminal microbiome.

conclusionsDiet has important effects on the complement of AMR genes in the rumen microbial community, with potential implications for human and animal health.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialMicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillotaBacteriocinsBacteroidetesCattleChloramphenicolDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMetagenomicsProteobacteriaRed MeatRumenAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsChloramphenicolmicrocinAMRDietsMetagenomicsProteobacteria ratioRumen microbiome

Identifiers

PMID29228991
PMCPMC5725880
OpenAlexW2775648451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.